Latest Law News
PEOPLE v. PEDRANO
As a component of a 12-year 4-month sentence, the trial court sentenced defendant to six years for count 3. It also imposed a two-year sentence for count 4
Updated: 09/15/2010 07:42A
PEOPLE v. PEDRANO
As a component of a 12-year 4-month sentence, the trial court sentenced defendant to six years for count 3. It also imposed a two-year sentence for count 4
Updated: 09/15/2010 07:42A
BOLAND v. BOLAND
The court, in essence, is a specialty body that concentrates on business law disputes. It routinely publishes opinions on business law issues.
Updated: 09/15/2010 07:42A
ROSS v. CHAKRABARTI
On March 14, 2008, Plaintiff, who is not authorized to practice law (Compl. ¶ 10.), filed a Complaint on behalf of Skipper in the District Court of Maryland
Updated: 09/15/2010 07:42A
STATE v. MOORE
The assignments of error notwithstanding, appellants essentially base their entire defense on a mistake-of-law theory, which is not a defense in the state
Updated: 09/15/2010 07:42A
English courts can enforce U.S. bankruptcy judgments without a separate proceeding
Eurofinance SA [2010] EWCA Civ 895, [2010] All ER (D) 358 (Jul), the English Court of Appeal, Civil Division, determined that a US bankruptcy court's
Updated: 09/15/2010 07:41A
English courts can enforce U.S. bankruptcy judgments without a separate proceeding
Eurofinance SA [2010] EWCA Civ 895, [2010] All ER (D) 358 (Jul), the English Court of Appeal, Civil Division, determined that a US bankruptcy court's
Updated: 09/15/2010 07:41A
Deutsche Telekom Is Focus of Corruption Investigation
“We are required by law to check out whether these allegations are true or whether they can be dismissed.” The probe stems from 2000-2005, when units of the
Updated: 09/15/2010 07:41A
PEOPLE v. LEGGETT
However, we reverse because the trial court's pervasive denigration of defendant's counsel, in front of the jury, deprived defendant of a fair trial.
Updated: 09/15/2010 07:41A
MH RESIDENTIAL 1, LLC v. BARRETT
Nor do the present circumstances warrant any grant of relief to respondents under the Act's anti-harassment provision (General Business Law § 352-eeee[4]).
Updated: 09/15/2010 07:41A
Primary Categories