Latest Law News
FLIPPEN v. JONES
1 Danny asserts the following points for reversal: (1) that the trial court clearly erred in ordering specific performance where Danny had an equitable right to rescind based upon Michael's fraudulent failure to disclose certain defects and an absolute
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:20A
PRATT v. STATE
On appeal, appellant asserts that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his probation; that the evidence does not support the trial court's finding that he violated the conditions of his probation; that the State did not afford him due process
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:20A
COPPE v. BLEICHER
"[R]elief from a judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and [the] court's ruling will not be disturbed except upon a showing of abuse of discretion." 2 We will find an abuse of discretion where we are "left with the definite
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:20A
COPPE v. BLEICHER
"[R]elief from a judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and [the] court's ruling will not be disturbed except upon a showing of abuse of discretion." 2 We will find an abuse of discretion where we are "left with the definite
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:20A
COPPE v. BLEICHER
"[R]elief from a judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and [the] court's ruling will not be disturbed except upon a showing of abuse of discretion." 2 We will find an abuse of discretion where we are "left with the definite
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:20A
JORDAN v. STATE
Likewise, in order to preserve a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a conviction for a lesser-included offense, a defendant must address the lesser-included offense either by name or by apprising the trial court of the specific
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:20A
JORDAN v. STATE
Likewise, in order to preserve a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a conviction for a lesser-included offense, a defendant must address the lesser-included offense either by name or by apprising the trial court of the specific
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:20A
ACKERMAN v. STATE
Appellant, Wayne Ackerman, was tried by the court and found guilty of the offense of driving while intoxicated, first offense, an unclassified misdemeanor. He brings this appeal, contending that the trial court erred in failing to ensure that he waived
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:20A
Charles Taylor trial draws to close; defence charges prosecution witnesses of
The three international judges then begin considering their verdict, which could take several months. Taylor, the first African head of state to face an international tribunal, has denied responsibility for atrocities committed by rebels during Sierra
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:20A
Guest Soapbox: CMC's budget woes continue
With tax revenues declining over the past three years as a result of a failed economy and housing crash, only three states have escaped moderate to severe cuts in services, Alaska, Montana, and West Virginia.
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:19A
Primary Categories