Latest Law News
SCHANZLE v. JPMC SPECIALTY MORTGAGE LLC
Appellant David Evan Schanzle, appearing pro se, appeals the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee JPMC Specialty Mortgage LLC ("JPMC") in a suit for judicial foreclosure and breach of contract based on Schanzle's default
Updated: 03/14/2011 08:06A
STATE v. FORTY-TWO (42) GAMBLING DEVICES
Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo. Panel A: Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. The State appeals an order dismissing the underlying forfeiture case for want of prosecution. Finding no abuse of discretion by the trial court,
Updated: 03/14/2011 08:06A
JKR PERSONAL CARE, LLC v. BRYANT
JKR contends that the trial court's decision contradicted the evidence, which evidence allegedly established, as a matter of law, that Bryant agreed to pay for the charges. We overrule the issue and affirm the judgment. On May 24, 2007, Bryant signed a
Updated: 03/14/2011 08:06A
BLUELINX CORPORATION v. TEXAS CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS, INC.
Appellant Bluelinx Corporation appeals from the trial court's judgment entered in favor of TCS after a jury trial. In six issues, Bluelinx argues that (a) the trial court erred in submitting a jury question on quantum meruit and the evidence is
Updated: 03/14/2011 08:06A
DAVIS v. STATE
We affirm the trial court's judgment because (1) the evidence sufficiently supports the verdict and (2) the accomplice-witness testimony was sufficiently corroborated. In evaluating evidentiary sufficiency, we review all the evidence in the light most
Updated: 03/14/2011 08:06A
TUTT v. STATE
1 Tutt complains his lawyer was ineffective, the trial court erred in denying his continuance motion, in failing to conduct a hearing on his lawyer's performance, and in allowing Tutt to represent himself. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Updated: 03/14/2011 08:06A
TUTT v. STATE
1 Tutt complains his lawyer was ineffective, the trial court erred in denying his continuance motion, in failing to conduct a hearing on his lawyer's performance, and in allowing Tutt to represent himself. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Updated: 03/14/2011 08:06A
SALCIDO v. STATE
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted and sentenced to seven years confinement in the ID-TDCJ. He appeals contending that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment of the trial court. We disagree with appellant and affirm the judgment
Updated: 03/14/2011 08:06A
KENNEDY v. STATE
Penal Code Ann. §§ 15.01 (West 2003) (explaining criminal attempt), 19.02 (defining murder), 22.05 (West 2003) (defining crime of deadly conduct), § 19.03(a)(1) (West Supp. 2010) (providing that person commits capital murder if he "murders a peace
Updated: 03/14/2011 08:06A
KENNEDY v. STATE
Penal Code Ann. §§ 15.01 (West 2003) (explaining criminal attempt), 19.02 (defining murder), 22.05 (West 2003) (defining crime of deadly conduct), § 19.03(a)(1) (West Supp. 2010) (providing that person commits capital murder if he "murders a peace
Updated: 03/14/2011 08:06A
Primary Categories