Latest Law News
RAMIREZ v. AMERICAN POLLUTION CONTROL CORPORATION
Shortly after his injury, Ramirez commenced a lawsuit against AMPOL, asserting liability under the Jones Act for his injuries (the "Jones Act lawsuit"). After a bench trial, the district court determined that Ramirez was forty percent at fault for his
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:03A
US wants to block profits from illegal websites
Maria Pallante, the acting US Registrar of Copyrights told the House Judiciary Committee that the legislation could also stop US advertising networks from placing advertising on such websites. Pallante claimed that search engines "routinely point to
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:03A
U.S. v. STANFORD
The final judgement rule "has particular force in criminal prosecutions because encouragement of delay is fatal to the vindication of the criminal law." United States v. MacDonald, 435 US 850, 853-54 (1978) (quotation marks omitted).
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:03A
U.S. v. STANFORD
The final judgement rule "has particular force in criminal prosecutions because encouragement of delay is fatal to the vindication of the criminal law." United States v. MacDonald, 435 US 850, 853-54 (1978) (quotation marks omitted).
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:03A
DEL-RAY BATTERY COMPANY v. DOUGLAS BATTERY COMPANY
Plaintiffs then brought this federal court action asserting five separate claims: a claim under the SREA seeking recovery of their attorneys' and experts' fees incurred in defending the state court lawsuit, and four declaratory judgment claims
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:03A
U.S. v. FOUNTAIN
7 A jury's guilty verdict will be upheld if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, a rational factfinder could have found each element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v.
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:03A
JING ZHUO JIANG v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF U.S.
Jiang Zhuo Jiang petitions for review of a final order of removal entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), which dismissed his appeal of an immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal,
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:03A
MASESA v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF U.S.
Said Rashid Masesa petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") dismissing his appeal of an Immigration Judge's ("IJ") order of removal. We will deny the petition for review. Because the parties are familiar with the
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:03A
OPARE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF U.S.
Thus, in order to succeed on the petition for review, Opare must ultimately show that the discretionary decision was somehow arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law. See Tipu v. INS, 20 F.3d 580, 582 (3d Cir. 1994). Because Opare's immigration
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:03A
U.S. v. DESNOYERS
LISA E. JONES, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC (Ignacia S. Moreno, Assistant Attorney General; Richard S. Hartunian, United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York;
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:02A
Primary Categories