Latest Law News
STATE v. HOLT
The trial court treated defendant's motion as a petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 3:22. Counsel was appointed, and he filed a brief and an affidavit by defendant in support of the petition. Defendant asserted that he had been induced to
Updated: 03/16/2011 07:31A
OLSEN v. SANDAX, INC.
Defendant Sandax Inc., d/b/a Wallington Exchange (Exchange), a restaurant for catering private events, appeals a jury verdict of $1281755.50 inclusive of prejudgment interest, representing the jury determination that Exchange was seventy-five percent
Updated: 03/16/2011 07:31A
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE TOWN OF KEARNY
The Town of Kearny (Kearny or the Town) appeals from a trial court order dated September 6, 2005, in favor of New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company (NJM), and a December 8, 2009 order in favor of General Security Property and Casualty Insurance
Updated: 03/16/2011 07:31A
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE TOWN OF KEARNY
The Town of Kearny (Kearny or the Town) appeals from a trial court order dated September 6, 2005, in favor of New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company (NJM), and a December 8, 2009 order in favor of General Security Property and Casualty Insurance
Updated: 03/16/2011 07:31A
A-PAC GLOBAL, INC. v. FUTURE WORKS UNLIMITED, INC.
Because we conclude the trial court mistakenly exercised its discretion in excluding certain evidence proffered by plaintiff, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. A-PAC manufactured and sold wholesale CD and DVD cases.
Updated: 03/16/2011 07:31A
STATE v. HOWARD
The trial court granted the State's motion for imposition of an extended term pursuant to NJSA 2C:44-3(a). The court merged count two with count one and sentenced defendant on count one to twenty-two years of incarceration. The court ordered that
Updated: 03/16/2011 07:31A
STATE v. HOWARD
The trial court granted the State's motion for imposition of an extended term pursuant to NJSA 2C:44-3(a). The court merged count two with count one and sentenced defendant on count one to twenty-two years of incarceration. The court ordered that
Updated: 03/16/2011 07:31A
KIEFFER v. BUY
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of all three defendants, concluding that they were not negligent or otherwise liable for the patron's injuries. Despite the no-negligence finding, the court ruled that All Cleaning was responsible to
Updated: 03/16/2011 07:31A
GASTON ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, P.C. v. OAKWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC
Justice Michael E Wheat delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Plaintiff Gaston Engineering & Surveying, PC ("Gaston") appeals from two orders of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County; the first granting summary judgment to Defendant
Updated: 03/16/2011 07:31A
ADKINS v. HONTZ
In Point Three, the plaintiffs argue the trial court erred in granting Hontz's pre-judgment "Motion to Apply Offset or Credit" in the wrongful death case in its "Docket Entry and Order" on May 24, 2010, with respect to the personal injury protection
Updated: 03/16/2011 07:31A
Primary Categories