Latest Legal Marketing News
STATE v. WOODS
Woods contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict and that he is entitled to a new trial because the real controversy was not fully tried. See Wis. Stat. § 752.35 (2009-10). 1 We affirm. ¶ 2 Woods first argues that there
Updated: 08/17/2011 07:42A
STATE v. PARKS
{¶1} Defendant-appellant, Pia Parks ("appellant"), appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas finding her guilty, pursuant to a jury verdict, of the stipulated lesser-included offense of assault, in violation of RC 2903.13,
Updated: 08/17/2011 07:40A
FAIRFIELD HARBOUR PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. MIDSOUTH GOLF, LLC.
Where on 27 August 2009 Defendant entered notice of appeal of judgment on "all rulings made by [the trial court] against Defendant during the trial and any pre-trial proceedings," we hold that notice of appeal was proper. Where the trial court denied
Updated: 08/17/2011 07:39A
STATE v. TORRES
First, Defendant contends the trial court erred in not requiring the State to disclose the identity of a confidential informant. Second, Defendant argues the trial court erred in denying Defendant's Motion to Suppress the out-of-court, pre-trial
Updated: 08/17/2011 07:39A
HARRIS v. STATE
Aggrieved, Harris appeals and argues that the Lincoln County Circuit Court erred when it declined to grant his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) because there was insufficient evidence of the "breaking" element of burglary.
Updated: 08/17/2011 07:37A
PATTON v. STATE
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we find the State's theory that Patton could distinguish right from wrong when he shot his wife is supported by expert testimony and reasonable inferences drawn from the circumstances
Updated: 08/17/2011 07:37A
COMMONWEALTH v. LASSITER
The jury returned a verdict of not guilty on the negligent operation charge and guilty on the OUI charge. The verdicts were recorded, and the jury were asked to return to the jury room. They were not, however, formally discharged because it was not yet
Updated: 08/17/2011 07:37A
JACKSON v. STATE
On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court does not weigh the evidence or determine witness
Updated: 08/17/2011 07:36A
BROWN v. STATE
Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, 2 the evidence showed that Brown was driving on Interstate 20 when Trooper Ray Malone with the Georgia State Patrol observed him committing the traffic offense of following too closely.
Updated: 08/17/2011 07:36A
CAMPAGNOLO S.R.L. v. FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC.
The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant FSA on all counts. The district court entered judgment in favor of FSA and denied Campagnolo's motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury verdict and for a new trial. The district court also denied
Updated: 08/17/2011 07:35A