Latest Legal Marketing News
THE ESTATE OF LAWSON v. MERCY HOSPITAL FAIRFIELD
{¶1} Plaintiff-appellant, the Estate of Mary M. Lawson, appeals a decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas entering a general verdict in favor of defendant-appellee, Mercy Hospital Fairfield. {¶2} This action arose from a fall which occurred
Updated: 09/07/2011 07:03A
STATE v. LITTLE
The three men consumed alcohol and socialized during this time. Eventually, they returned to Rorie's automobile in order to drive home. While they were traveling back to their respective homes, defendant told Thompson that he "didn't appreciate
Updated: 09/07/2011 07:02A
STATE v. WEATHERS
Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault inflicting serious injury upon a detention officer in violation of NC Gen. Stat. § 14.34.7 (2007). He brings forward two issues: (1) whether the trial court erred
Updated: 09/07/2011 07:02A
STATE v. FLOYD
The trial court entered judgment pursuant to the verdict and sentenced defendant to a term of 108 to 139 months imprisonment. Defendant gave notice of appeal in open court. We first address defendant's argument that the trial court erred in denying his
Updated: 09/07/2011 07:02A
IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF RANEY
Propounder claims the trial court erred by (1) denying her motion for a directed verdict; (2) denying her motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict; (3) denying her post-judgment motion for a new trial; (4) admitting the medical records of her
Updated: 09/07/2011 07:01A
RIVERA-GUADIANA v. STATE
On appeal, he argues that: (1) the circuit court erred when it refused a jury instruction on reasonable doubt, and (2) the verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. We find no error and affirm. ¶ 2. On February 10, 2009,
Updated: 09/07/2011 07:00A
STATE v. THONGPASOM
In doing so, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and assume that the jury believed the evidence supporting the guilty verdict and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary. Id. We will not disturb the verdict if the jury,
Updated: 09/07/2011 07:00A
HART v. GROVES
Groves was injured in an automobile accident and hired Hart to represent her on a personal injury claim against the driver of the other automobile. Shortly after Hart filed suit on behalf of Groves, the suit settled for the $25000.00 liability limit in
Updated: 09/07/2011 06:59A
U.S. v. SNIPES
That former juror further explained that in order to reach a unanimous verdict, the jurors compromised by convicting Snipes on three of the lesser counts, believing that he would not receive jail time. The second former juror referenced the allegations
Updated: 09/07/2011 06:58A
JOYCE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Following a jury verdict in Joyce's favor, the trial court granted the motion and entered judgment in favor of Ford. The trial court also granted Ford's motion for directed verdict on the issue of civil penalties (§ 1794, subd.
Updated: 09/07/2011 06:58A
Primary Categories