Latest Legal Marketing News
PEOPLE v. LUGO
The theory of the defense on summation was that the victims were not credible, "a theory that applies equally to the offenses" of burglary in the first degree and the lesser included offense of criminal trespass in the second degree under Penal Law
Updated: 10/03/2011 06:58A
PEOPLE v. McGEE
Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see Danielson, 9 NY3d at 349), we reject defendant's contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see generally Bleakley, 69 NY2d at 495).
Updated: 10/03/2011 06:58A
Colors welcomes grape variety verdict
A High Court decision to grant Suth African exporter Colors Fruit ownership of five seedless table grape varieties in South Africa has been welcomed by the company's managing director, Riaan van Wyk. The grape cultivars in question,
Updated: 10/03/2011 06:57A
PEOPLE v. CRANE
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of three counts of falsifying business records in the first degree (Penal Law § 175.10). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury
Updated: 10/03/2011 06:57A
TODD v. PLSIII, LLC
In support of Todd's motion to set aside the verdict, Todd and Hasley relied primarily on stipulated evidence consisting of a chart depicting the sequence of the traffic signals at the two intersections through which Washington traveled before
Updated: 10/03/2011 06:57A
PEOPLE v. STANFORD
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]). We reject defendant's contention that County Court erred in refusing to charge manslaughter in the second
Updated: 10/03/2011 06:57A
PEOPLE v. NEWMAN
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of promoting a sexual performance by a child (Penal Law § 263.15), forcible touching (§ 130.52), and two counts each of unlawful surveillance in the second degree
Updated: 10/03/2011 06:57A
SEAWRIGHT v. CROOKS
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, defendants' post-trial motion is granted, the verdict is set aside, and a new trial is granted on the issues of serious injury, proximate cause
Updated: 10/03/2011 06:57A
PEOPLE v. DAVIS
Contrary to the further contention of defendant, we conclude that the court properly quashed his subpoena duces tecum seeking DNA evidence pertaining to a suspect who had been excluded by the police. The subpoena in question ordered the State Division
Updated: 10/03/2011 06:57A
PEOPLE v. STUBINGER
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of 15 counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]), defendant contends that the conviction is not supported by legally sufficient
Updated: 10/03/2011 06:56A
Primary Categories