Latest Legal Marketing News
Death eyed for killer in Connecticut
After the verdict was read he sat back in his chair, rocked slightly back and forth, and glanced at the jury. He yawned as he was led out of the court. The only survivor of the attack, Dr. William Petit, bit his lip and closed his eyes as the verdict
Updated: 10/14/2011 07:01A
Ontario school board nixes solar panels
ONTARIO -- The Ontario school board wasted no time reaching a verdict on a proposal to bring solar power to the district. "The board has decided they don't want to participate in the project right now," Superintendent Lisa Carmichael said Thursday.
Updated: 10/14/2011 07:00A
CARTER v. CLINE
The trial court held that Carter failed to timely challenge the alleged defects in the domestication proceedings and therefore waived any objections to enforcement of those judgments in Texas. In seven issues on appeal, Carter contends that there was
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:45A
HIPPELY v. LINCOLN ELEC. HOLDINGS, INC.
The case proceeded to trial and the jury returned a verdict in favor of Lincoln Electric. Appellant did file a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, as well as a motion for a new trial, both of which the trial court denied.
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
TECHNICAL CONSTR. SPECIALITIES v. COOPER
The trial court abused its discretion when it denied TCS's motion for a new trial as to the amount of damages the jury awarded." "III. The trial court abused its discretion when it denied TCS's motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict as to
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
PEOPLE v. WALCOTT
The verdict was based on legally insufficient evidence. In any event, regardless of sufficiency, the verdict was against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). This case involves missing cash at a store where
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:43A
PEOPLE v. HURD
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The jury could have reasonably concluded that defendant acted with the mental state required for each crime. The court provided a meaningful
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:43A
PEOPLE v. NETTLES
A juror is "grossly unqualified" only "when it becomes obvious that a particular juror possesses a state of mind which would prevent the rendering of an impartial verdict" (People v Buford, 69 NY2d 290, 298 [1987] [internal quotation marks and citation
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:43A
PEOPLE v. HOLT
The People appeal the trial court's order vacating a jury's guilty verdict and ordering a new trial. We reverse and remand. In doing so, we conclude that a juror's statement during deliberations regarding the severity of a charged offense does not
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
HARALAMPOPOULOS v. KELLY
In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff, Vasilios Haralampopoulos, by his guardian, John Haralampopoulos, appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendants, Jason L. Kelly, MD, and Mauricio L. Waintrub, MD, and the order
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
Primary Categories