Latest Legal Marketing News
Dodds - EU Powers
He sought a guarantee that the British people would be able to deliver their verdict on European measures. Responding, Prime Minister David Cameron pointed out that the Government had passed a law that said that British people needed to be asked before
Updated: 12/07/2011 07:36A
TIMBER INTEGRATED INVESTMENTS, LLC v. WELCH
Although plaintiffs quote the law as to "inconsistent verdicts," plaintiffs fail to state how they themselves may be subject to inconsistent verdicts or how such a verdict may occur. As to their specific case, plaintiffs' entire argument is "since the
Updated: 12/07/2011 07:34A
STATE v. PERRY
Clifton Leroy Perry, Jr. ("Defendant") appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery with a dangerous weapon, possession of firearm by a felon, assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, and second degree kidnapping.
Updated: 12/07/2011 07:34A
STATE v. BRITT
Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the first-degree murder of his wife, Nancy Melton Britt, and sentencing him to life imprisonment without parole. We find no error in his trial.
Updated: 12/07/2011 07:34A
ALLISON v. DAVIDSON
Donald William Davidson (Defendant) appeals from judgment entered following a jury verdict finding Defendant in breach of contract and awarding the sum of $541020.83 in damages to Richard Allison (Plaintiff). Defendant also appeals the trial court's
Updated: 12/07/2011 07:33A
EDGEWATER SERVICES, INC. v. EPIC LOGISTICS, INC.
1 Osgood appeals from: (1) the trial court's 26 May 2010 order denying in part her motion in limine; (2) the trial court's orally entered 9 June 2010 order denying in part her motion for a directed verdict; and (3) the trial court's 12 August 2010
Updated: 12/07/2011 07:33A
PEOPLE v. RINGER
We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The evidence supports an inference of constructive possession (see People v Manini, 79 NY2d 561, 573 [1992]), and it does not
Updated: 12/07/2011 07:30A
PEOPLE v. HUDSON
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There was a chain of circumstantial evidence, including defendant's behavior at the time of the
Updated: 12/07/2011 07:30A
ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING v. ARBOR HEIGHTS, LLC
(Arbor), upon a jury verdict in this breach of contract action. On appeal, Associated challenges the district court's failure to grant a directed verdict and the court's inclusion of workmanlike manner in the jury instructions.
Updated: 12/07/2011 07:29A
TAYLOR v. GIANT OF MARYLAND, LLC
We are asked to review a jury verdict in favor of the Petitioner, Julia M. Taylor, an African American female, in a suit in which she alleged both sexual discrimination and retaliatory termination against Giant of Maryland LLC, Respondent.
Updated: 12/07/2011 07:27A
Primary Categories