Latest Trial Court News
STATE v. OLIVER
{¶ 5} "FIRST ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR: Appellant's guilty plea was not made knowingly and voluntarily because the trial court misinformed appellant about his eligibility for judicial release. The trial court therefore erred in accepting appellant's plea of
Updated: 10/17/2011 06:48A
STATE v. BOLES
In his motion, appellant argued that due to a clerical error, the court omitted the dates from December 19 through December 27, 2006, when appellant was initially jailed on the charges. On March 7, 2011, the trial court, without discussion,
Updated: 10/17/2011 06:48A
STATE v. BROOKS
1 The convictions were pursuant to jury verdicts in a June 1995 jury trial. {¶ 2} The trial court sentenced appellant to serve eight consecutive sentences of life imprisonment, two concurrent sentences of five to twenty-five years, and five consecutive
Updated: 10/17/2011 06:48A
STATE v. DIXON
The trial court found him guilty and sentenced him to community control. {¶ 2} Dixon appeals from his conviction, challenging the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss. For the following reasons, the trial court's judgment will be affirmed.
Updated: 10/17/2011 06:48A
STATE v. SANTIAGO
{¶ 1} David Santiago, Jr. was found guilty on his no contest plea of trafficking in drugs, after the trial court overruled his motions to suppress evidence and to withdraw his plea. Santiago appeals from his conviction. {¶ 2} In the early morning hours
Updated: 10/17/2011 06:48A
STATE v. SEXTON
The trial court sentenced him to 157 days' incarceration followed by three years of community control. The court also ordered him to pay restitution for lost wages to the victim, Joshua Lang. This appeal followed. {¶2} In his sole assignment of error,
Updated: 10/17/2011 06:48A
HADASSAH v. SCHWARTZ
{¶1} Judgment debtor-appellant Robert L. Schwartz appeals the trial court's judgment denying his motion to quash and overruling his objections to a garnishment order, which permitted garnishment of Schwartz's property held in a law firm's IOLTA account
Updated: 10/17/2011 06:48A
STATE v. MacHADO
The critical factual dispute at trial was the identification of defendant, Pablo S. Machado, as one of the robbers. Although other issues are raised by defendant on appeal, the pivotal issue before us is whether the trial court improperly admitted
Updated: 10/17/2011 06:47A
M.C. v. A.C.
He contends the trial court erred in failing to allow him to present additional evidence; the record does not support the trial court's determination that he committed acts of harassment as defined in NJSA 2C:33-4; and there was insufficient evidence
Updated: 10/17/2011 06:47A
COMMONWEALTH v. BARROS
A single justice of this court denied the petition without a hearing, and the Commonwealth appeals. The sole, very limited question before us is whether the single justice committed a clear error of law or abused her discretion in denying the
Updated: 10/17/2011 06:47A
Primary Categories