Latest Trial Court News
IN RE SHIRLEY
The Judgment also directed that the Plaintiff recover the avoided transfer for the benefit of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy estate pursuant to 11 USC § 550(a)(1) (2006) and that the Defendant transfer her interest in Caney Creek Tract 1 back to the Debtors
Updated: 10/20/2011 07:44A
EX PARTE NORVELL
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 10/20/2011 07:44A
EX PARTE PAYNE
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 10/20/2011 07:44A
EX PARTE ESPARZA
The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Esparza v.
Updated: 10/20/2011 07:44A
EX PARTE FREEMAN
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 10/20/2011 07:44A
IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.V.Z.
Before the Court is the motion of appellant Megan Van Zelfden requesting appellate review of the trial court's order sustaining the contest to her affidavit of indigence. The trial court held a hearing on the contest and signed an order sustaining the
Updated: 10/20/2011 07:44A
GREEN v. STATE
Concluding appellant's issues are without merit, we affirm the trial court's judgment. Appellant and his wife, the complainant, lived with his mother-in-law Peggy Wallace and her terminally ill husband. Wallace recalled that one night she heard her
Updated: 10/20/2011 07:44A
TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC. v. ORIX CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC
In three issues, Transcontinental generally contends: (1) the trial court erred in granting declaratory relief because no justiciable controversy existed and because Orix had previously filed, but abandoned, a breach of contract claim raising the same
Updated: 10/20/2011 07:44A
SWEED v. STATE
The First Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment, holding that the trial court did not err by failing to submit a lesser-included-offense jury instruction for theft. Sweed v. State, 321 SW3d 42 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2010).
Updated: 10/20/2011 07:44A
SUNIGA v. STATE
We affirm the trial court's judgment. This case arises out of the same November 1, 2008 robbery at Metro News Service, a telemarketing business in San Antonio, that formed the basis of a prior appeal decided by this court. See Soliz v. State, No.
Updated: 10/20/2011 07:44A
Primary Categories