Latest Trial Court News
DIGGS v. GENETIC PROFILES CORPORATION
After this review, it appeared to the Court that it may not have jurisdiction. Specifically, it appeared that the order appealed in this matter was entered by the trial court on April 29, 2011, and the pro se appellant, Kenneth E. Diggs,
Updated: 10/24/2011 09:27A
LAKE v. MEMPHIS LANDSMEN, L.L.C.
Id. Beginning on August 4, 2008, the case was tried to a jury. Lake I, at *3. At the close of Plaintiffs'/Appellants' proof, the trial court denied Appellees' motions for directed verdict, and again denied the renewed motions for directed verdict at
Updated: 10/24/2011 09:27A
CITY OF PARIS v. ABBOTT
The City and Carruth filed a plea to the jurisdiction, which the trial court granted with respect only to Abbott's claims filed under the Texas Tort Claims Act. 1 The trial court denied the City's plea to jurisdiction relating to Abbott's claims for
Updated: 10/24/2011 09:27A
GOBLIRSCH v. EL CAMINO REAL SKY, LTD.
For the reasons set forth more fully below, this court affirms the judgment of the trial court. {¶ 2} On September 22, 2009, appellants filed a personal injury lawsuit against appellees arising from the slip and fall incident at appellees' restaurant.
Updated: 10/24/2011 09:27A
STATE v. UNDERWOOD
Underwood argues that his conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence and that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. He maintains that the trial court erred in refusing to allow police dispatch records into evidence and
Updated: 10/24/2011 09:27A
HARDY v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.
Since August 2000, Hardy has been employed full time as a medical science liaison at P&G. She works with physicians, training them to conduct continuing medical education on products as well as performing consultation requests regarding off-label uses
Updated: 10/24/2011 09:27A
HILL v. FALLAHZADEH
This is the second time this issue has come before this Court in this case. The previous time, this Court remanded the case to the trial court for it to consider the factors of Ward v. Housman, 809 SW2d 717 (Ky. App. 1991), which set forth the standard
Updated: 10/24/2011 09:27A
SOHAL PROPERTIES, LLC v. MOA PROPERTIES, LLC
Under the circumstances presented in this case, we conclude that the appellees' retention of the security deposit constituted an invalid forfeiture. Therefore, we reverse and remand the judgment of the trial court with respect to the disposition of
Updated: 10/24/2011 09:27A
ENQUIRER v. CITY OF FORT THOMAS
During Mrs. McCafferty's criminal trial, the trial court admitted numerous exhibits into evidence, including two videotapes. One of these depicted the exterior of the McCafferty home, via a police cruiser camera. The other depicted the exterior and
Updated: 10/24/2011 09:27A
SETTERS v. COMMONWEALTH
Aaron D. Setters appeals from a judgment of conviction by the Jefferson Circuit Court, arguing that the trial court erred by imposing costs on him despite his indigent status. We agree with Setters that the trial court was not authorized to impose
Updated: 10/24/2011 09:27A
Primary Categories