Latest Trial Court News
GIBSON v. KAPPEL
Teresa Gibson (mother) appeals a December 27, 2010 decision by the trial court awarding sole legal and physical custody of her minor child to Eleanor and Eugene Kappel (grandparents). Mother contends the trial court was plainly wrong in failing to give
Updated: 11/16/2011 07:53A
U.S. v. D'COSTA
This proceeding is subject to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Colorado and the MSK Civ. Practice Standards.
Updated: 11/16/2011 07:53A
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CMKM DIAMONDS, INC.
The District Court may modify or set aside any portion of a magistrate's ruling on non-dispositive pre-trial motions found to be "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); see also, eg, Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco,
Updated: 11/16/2011 07:53A
RUDOLPH v. BUNCOMBE COUNTY GOVERNMENT
The Pre-Trial Order and Case Management Plan entered in this matter provides that no brief may exceed twenty-five pages in length. [Doc. 23 at 5]. Despite the Plaintiff's pro se status, she must abide by the procedures prescribed by that Order.
Updated: 11/16/2011 07:53A
IN RE JACKSON
Ware filed an answer in which he admitted violating the automatic stay. 1 A settlement could not be reached. At trial, Jackson asked for $6345 in actual damages and $19305 in punitive damages. The Court found only $1460 in actual damages.
Updated: 11/16/2011 07:53A
OWENS v. STATE
In his sole point of error, Owens asserts that the trial court erred by admitting the complainant's out of court statements in violation of the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. 1 Having determined Owens suffered no constitutional harm
Updated: 11/16/2011 07:53A
KONEMANY v. STATE
Gainous and appellant had spoken previously, and there was a tentative agreement that the drugs would be sold at a price of $1000. When Gainous and the complainant arrived, they had only a few hundred dollars in cash and merchandise between them.
Updated: 11/16/2011 07:53A
IN RE MASON
On October 25, 2011, relator Harold B. Mason, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator complains that the trial court denied his claim of indigence and he is unable to pay
Updated: 11/16/2011 07:53A
EX PARTE JOYNER
In his writ application, appellant raised several challenges to the theft indictment in his underlying case and alleged the denial of his right to self-representation, among other matters. On August 31, 2011, the trial court conducted a hearing on the
Updated: 11/16/2011 07:53A
ORTIZ v. JUNELL LAW FIRM
Therefore, the trial court does not dispose of all claims and all parties until after arbitration is completed. Id. When an order compelling arbitration stays the underlying case, there can be no immediate appeal of the order. 1 See Green Tree Fin.
Updated: 11/16/2011 07:53A
Primary Categories