Latest Trial Court News
COMMONWEALTH v. DYARMAN
The trial court overruled Appellant's objection and admitted the calibration logs. The trial court found Appellant guilty of both counts of DUI, and thereafter sentenced her to 30 days to six months' incarceration, plus costs and fees.
Updated: 11/17/2011 07:28A
STATE v. EARLS
On appeal from the trial court's judgment of conviction, defendant contends that the court erred in (1) imposing a presumptive 13-month sentence for each count of first-degree theft pursuant to ORS 137.717 (2005) 1 and (2) failing to merge defendant's
Updated: 11/17/2011 07:27A
CITY OF TALLMADGE v. RAGLE
The reviewing court "must then independently determine, without deference to the conclusion of the trial court, whether the facts satisfy the applicable legal standard." Burnside, 2003-Ohio-5372, at ¶8. {¶3} Officer Eichler testified that,
Updated: 11/17/2011 07:27A
STATE v. HILLIARD
{¶ 1} Gregory Hilliard appeals from the trial court's imposition of post-release control. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the trial court's improper imposition of post-release control. {¶ 2} A jury convicted Mr. Hilliard of aggravated
Updated: 11/17/2011 07:27A
HAIRLINE CLINIC, INC. v. RIGGS-FEJES
{¶1} Denise Riggs-Fejes appeals from the trial court's judgment finding her in contempt of court and ordering her to pay Hairline Clinic, Inc. ("Hairline") $48000.00 in compensatory damages, $96000.00 in punitive damages, and Hairline's attorney fees.
Updated: 11/17/2011 07:27A
STATE v. CREEL
The State has conceded that the trial court erred in imposing sentences on allied offenses. We have reviewed the record and agree with the parties that Creel's sentence should be reversed and the matter remanded to the trial court.
Updated: 11/17/2011 07:27A
STATE v. WESSELING
Because we determine that Wesseling's assignments of error are without merit, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. {¶2} Wesseling was indicted on November 12, 2010, for attempted murder in violation of RC 2923.02(A), felonious assault in
Updated: 11/17/2011 07:27A
WRINCH v. MILLER
{¶3} In the prior appeal, this Court reversed a portion of the trial court's judgment and remanded the "matter to the trial court to determine the reasonableness of the fees requested [by Appellees David and Keville Miller] pursuant to Prof.Cond.
Updated: 11/17/2011 07:27A
Three in court after man is shot in the eye in Frome
The case against Doel was adjourned until January 12 for committal proceedings to take place after magistrates refused to accept jurisdiction ordering him to stand trial at Taunton Crown Court. The matter against Aylesbury was sent straight to the
Updated: 11/17/2011 07:26A
2G: Court orders CBI to respond to allegation of influencing witnesses
A Delhi court today asked CBI to file its response to the allegation of an accused in the 2G spectrum allocation scam case that the agency resorted to an "unhealthy practice" of calling a witness "unofficially" to its office in a bid to "tamper" with
Updated: 11/17/2011 07:25A