Latest Criminal Law News
Legal Aid Fees Dispute: “It's a farce.”
By the way, the quote in the title was originally attributed, in the UTV report, to an un-named senior criminal lawyer who was commenting on, what he claimed was, the lack of extensive criminal law experience of some of the firms on the list.
Updated: 06/14/2011 12:24P
Sayreville nude bar patrons can bring alcohol, appeals court panel rules
The unanimous three-judge panel, in a decision released this morning, ruled the borough's ordinance was pre-empted by the state's criminal code. "If a municipality permits BYOB (Bring Your Own Beverages), it may not enact an ordinance that regulates
Updated: 06/14/2011 12:02P
SC junks indictment bid vs Lacson
The Court ruled that petitioners lacked legal standing to question the CA ruling because they are no longer a party-in-interest in the case defined in criminal law rules. “The right of the petitioners to file the petition for review on certiorari to
Updated: 06/14/2011 11:55A
Concourt rules for trial of child rapist
The man had argued in lower courts that he could not prosecuted because section 69 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act had only come into force on December 16 2007 – more than two years after he allegedly raped a
Updated: 06/14/2011 11:18A
40 Deputies Ask Prosecutor General's Office To Explain Inactivity In Canceling
According to him, with its actions, the Prosecutor General's Office violates article 165 of the Criminal Procedure Code, according to which the recognizance not to leave should be annulled. At the same time, Zabzaliuk accused Pshonka that the
Updated: 06/14/2011 09:20A
Technicality won't get alleged child rapist off
The man had argued in lower courts that he could not prosecuted because Section 69 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act had only come into force on December 16 2007 - more than two years after he allegedly raped a
Updated: 06/14/2011 08:12A
Nail 'rapist' - Concourt
The man had argued in lower courts that he could not prosecuted because section 69 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act had only come into force on 16 December 2007 — more than two years after he allegedly raped a
Updated: 06/14/2011 07:31A
No escape for alleged child rapist
The man had argued in lower courts that he could not prosecuted because section 69 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act had only come into force on December 16, 2007 — more than two years after he allegedly raped a
Updated: 06/14/2011 07:20A
Alleged child rapist must be prosecuted
The man had argued in lower courts that he could not prosecuted because section 69 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act had only come into force on December 16, 2007 -- more than two years after he allegedly raped a
Updated: 06/14/2011 07:13A
ConCourt Orders Alleged Child Rapist Be Prosecuted
The man had argued in lower courts that he could not prosecuted because section 69 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act had only come into force on December 16, 2007 -- more than two years after he allegedly raped a
Updated: 06/14/2011 07:07A
Primary Categories