Latest Criminal Law News
Kazakhstan News.Net
But in the end, the Chaoyang district people's court which heard the case could not convict him for rape as China's criminal law only defined rape as
Updated: 01/05/2011 10:15A
China: Man convicted for raping another man
Rape, as defined by China's criminal law, refers to forcing a female to engage in sexual intercourse against her will. Consequently, Zhang's behaviour could
Updated: 01/05/2011 10:12A
SouthernCaliforniaDefenseBlog.com Ranked Most Popular California Defense Blog
The blog presents non-specific guidance if a person is accused of a crime and recent legal developments in the area of criminal law or procedure.
Updated: 01/05/2011 09:26A
Police killings and the law
Within decades the state assumed a monopoly on the application of criminal law and, with the police, a monopoly over the use of violence.
Updated: 01/05/2011 08:22A
WOZA Peace Day 83 finally removed off remand
The group has been charged under the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, Chapter 46, as read with Section 2 (v) of the Third Schedule to the
Updated: 01/05/2011 08:21A
PEOPLE v. CABALLERO
(People v. Dieck (2009) 46 Cal.4th 934, 939, fn. 3.) When appellant was sentenced on November 30, 2009, the court calculated appellant's conduct credit in
Updated: 01/05/2011 08:05A
Undertrials: Inadequate Solutions to Systemic Problems
The Indian Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) (2005) stipulation notwithstanding that accused are allowed to be held in remand for time period that is the
Updated: 01/05/2011 07:57A
National Security Act: Obscuring the Flaws in India's Criminal Justice System
In the normal course of the criminal law, a person accused of a crime is guaranteed the rights to a legal counsel,[6] to be informed of charges as soon as
Updated: 01/05/2011 07:57A
PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER
He presents a single issue concerning guilt determination: whether the trial court erred in giving the pattern instruction on witness identification.
Updated: 01/05/2011 07:52A
PEOPLE v. INGRAM
Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his supplemental motion for discovery under Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 ("Pitchess")
Updated: 01/05/2011 07:50A