Latest Criminal Law News
EX PARTE TURNER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:27A
EX PARTE BEAUCHAMP
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:27A
EX PARTE BURKS
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:27A
EX PARTE HORNSBY
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:27A
EX PARTE BAILEY
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:27A
EX PARTE ACROND
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:27A
EX PARTE ROYSTER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:27A
WARREN v. STATE
Therefore, in determining whether there is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict, we must review all the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the elements of the
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:27A
KUYKENDALL v. STATE
2009). In contrast, a court's holding is "[a] court's determination of a matter of law pivotal to its decision[.]" Id. at 800. Kuykendall argues that nondispositive remarks made in passing by the Court of Criminal Appeals do not bind this Court.
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:27A
HAWTHORNE v. STATE
The actor's belief that deadly force was immediately necessary is presumed reasonable if the actor: (3) was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:27A
Primary Categories