Latest Law News
IN RE ESTATE OF BRUNSWICK
{¶ 2} Fleming challenges the trial court's decision finding that the executor acted properly in allowing and classifying the claims of the estate. It is from this decision that Fleming now appeals. {¶ 3} Brunswick and Fleming were involved in a 17-year
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:33A
STATE v. HARPER
We affirm the decision of the trial court because the community control violation and sentence were proper and his trial counsel was not ineffective. {¶ 2} The trial court imposed community control sanctions in 2007 for Harper's felony domestic
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:33A
MILLER v. UNGER
For the reasons outlined below, we affirm the decision of the trial court. {¶ 2} The following procedural background is not in dispute. Sometime prior to October 2005, Unger hired Jose Acosta to install a concrete patio in Unger's back yard.
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:33A
MILLER v. UNGER
For the reasons outlined below, we affirm the decision of the trial court. {¶ 2} The following procedural background is not in dispute. Sometime prior to October 2005, Unger hired Jose Acosta to install a concrete patio in Unger's back yard.
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:33A
BOYER v. BOYER
Husband filed for divorce on September 2, 2009 and the trial court issued its Decision on February 25, 2010. Husband moved for a Clarification and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and the trial court issued additional findings of fact and
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:33A
STATE v. ROBERSON
In addition, after Mr. Roberson waived his right to a jury trial on the charge of having a weapon under disability, the trial court found him guilty. The trial court sentenced him to 41 years in prison. Mr. Roberson has appealed, arguing that the trial
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:33A
STATE v. McSHEPARD
On February 3, 2006, the motion to consolidate was granted by the trial court. A jury trial commenced on September 11, 2006. McShepard was found guilty of felonious assault on a peace officer in violation of RC 2903.11(A)(2) and (D)(1), having weapons
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:33A
STATE v. JACKSON
During discovery, Mr. Jackson moved the trial court for an order requiring the prosecutor to disclose the names of the witnesses who testified before the Grand Jury. The court granted his motion in part and denied it in part. While the court refused to
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:33A
STATE v. JACKSON
During discovery, Mr. Jackson moved the trial court for an order requiring the prosecutor to disclose the names of the witnesses who testified before the Grand Jury. The court granted his motion in part and denied it in part. While the court refused to
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:33A
STATE v. ROSEBROUGH
Rosebrough waived his right to a jury trial, and the matter proceeded to a bench trial on December 16, 2009. The trial court found Rosebrough guilty of both counts and both specifications, but merged the counts as allied offenses.
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:33A
Primary Categories