Latest Law News
McDANIEL v. McDANIEL
A jury found that the 2007 will was the product of undue influence and fraud, and the probate court entered judgment on the verdict. In Case No. S10A1497, the propounder appeals, contending that the probate court erred in denying his motion for
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:32A
DOLPHY v. STATE
The evidence at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, showed the following. Around 2:30 pm on January 3, 2006, Dolphy chased Drummond down Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive in Fulton County, shooting at Drummond with a 9 mm handgun.
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:32A
BRANDON v. STATE
Brandon appeals, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Discerning no error, we affirm. When reviewing a trial court's order on a motion to suppress, we construe the evidence most favorably to uphold the findings and
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:32A
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. v. SAMUEL
After a bench trial, the trial court granted judgment in favor of Gordon, finding that the property described in the security deed was ambiguous with respect to the Gordon parcel, and not subject to the security deed. Appellants appeal, contending that
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:32A
HUEZO-DIAZ v. HOLDER
from an immigration judge's decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). We have jurisdiction under 8 USC § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v.
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:32A
IN RE THOMPSON
Steven Thompson and Aster Kifle-Thompson ("debtors") appeal pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's judgment affirming the bankruptcy court's summary judgment in an adversary proceeding determining that a California state court judgment was a
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:32A
TERRONES-BELTRAN v. HOLDER
Betzaida Terrones-Beltran and her family, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 USC § 1252.
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:32A
ARANZAZU-GARCIA v. HOLDER
citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 USC § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Abebe v.
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:32A
GARCIA v. HOLDER
Roberto Jesus Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order affirming the decision of the immigration judge ("IJ") finding him removable as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony.
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:32A
MACIAS-VALENZUELA v. HOLDER
In these consolidated petitions for review, Enrique Macias-Valenzuela and Maria Teresa Macias, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") orders dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge's
Updated: 03/08/2011 05:32A
Primary Categories