Latest Law News
BERGER v. STEPHAN
Over defendants' objection, Freidrich testified that he believed that Rudiger requested the stated purchase price of DM 49500 so Rudiger could avoid paying taxes on the property's increased value. Freidrich further explained that DM 49500 was more than
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:26A
BENSON v. HARRELL
The case was sent to mandatory court-annexed arbitration, where defendant eventually prevailed and was awarded attorney fees. Accordingly, the trial court entered a general judgment pursuant to which plaintiffs were to pay defendant the sum of $4635.50
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:26A
STATE v. GONZALES
On appeal, defendant raises numerous challenges to his convictions, none of which he preserved in the trial court, and all of which he contends involve errors that are apparent on the face of the record. ORAP 5.45. First, defendant argues that the
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:26A
Getting to know Judge Vicki Argento
Seen at her chambers at the Hall of Justice. By Bethany Young, staff writer It had to be yellow. Her friends and colleagues begged her not to, but Judge Victoria Argento had other plans for her campaign colors during her most recent run for Monroe
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:26A
STATE v. TALAFHAH
On March 12, 2008, the trial court sentenced him to seven years each on the two counts of rape and the attempted rape as well as four years on the sexual battery conviction. The sentences were to be served concurrently for a total of seven years.
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:26A
SHUMAKER v. PARK LANE MANOR OF AKRON
The trial court granted summary judgment to the City because it determined the City did not owe a duty to Ms. Shumaker and was entitled to political subdivision immunity. It granted summary judgment to Park Lane because it concluded that the condition
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:26A
STATE v. ROMERO
The trial court placed both the 2005 and 2006 cases on the inactive docket and issued arrest warrants for Romero due to his failure to appear. In 2009, a supplemental indictment added a charge for Romero's failure to appear, in violation of RC 2937.29,
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:26A
STATE v. LONG
Under Rule 32(C) of the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure, "[a] judgment of conviction shall set forth the plea, the verdict, or findings, upon which each conviction is based, and the sentence." The Ohio Supreme Court has interpreted that rule to
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:26A
STATE v. LONG
Under Rule 32(C) of the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure, "[a] judgment of conviction shall set forth the plea, the verdict, or findings, upon which each conviction is based, and the sentence." The Ohio Supreme Court has interpreted that rule to
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:26A
PRICE v. KARATJAS
{¶2} Carmen Price was a nurse at Ridgewood Healthcare Center, LLC ("Ridgewood"). Becky Karatjas was her immediate supervisor. As alleged in the trial court complaint, Karatjas began ordering nurses not to chart bruising or other evidence of injury
Updated: 03/10/2011 07:26A
Primary Categories