Latest Law News
PEOPLE v. DE LARA
The trial court sentenced him to 24 years in state prison in accordance with the plea. Defendant's ensuing appeal is subject to the principles of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:02A
PEOPLE v. FLORES
The trial court determined that the pleas were knowing and intelligent and accepted the pleas. The court sentenced appellant to two years on count one and one-third the midterm, or eight months, on each of counts two, three, and four, for a total of
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:02A
PEOPLE v. TASSO
The trial court awarded Tasso no presentence custody credit because he had already been sentenced to state prison in case number BA365267. The court ordered Tasso to pay a $30 security assessment, a $30 criminal fine assessment and a $400 restitution
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:02A
PEOPLE v. DELORENZO
Appellant claims that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of the ATM withdrawals as circumstantial evidence of intent. (Evid. Code, § 1101, subd. (b)).) The trial court overruled an Evidence Code section 352 objection and instructed that the
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:02A
GARDENIAS v. CANDREVA
Gardenias filed a complaint for damages for personal injury on April 6, 2009. Discovery was initiated and an arbitration hearing was scheduled for January 20, 2010. On October 30, 2009, Gardenias' attorney, Pejman Rahnama, served by regular mail a
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:02A
GARDENIAS v. CANDREVA
Gardenias filed a complaint for damages for personal injury on April 6, 2009. Discovery was initiated and an arbitration hearing was scheduled for January 20, 2010. On October 30, 2009, Gardenias' attorney, Pejman Rahnama, served by regular mail a
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:02A
PEOPLE v. VANDENANDEL
She saw blood on the bed and Sheila Vandenandel's body on the floor next to the bed. Vandenandel told Flynn to leave and shut the front door once she was outside. Telephone records established Vandenandel used his mother's cell phone to call the police
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:01A
IN RE MARRIAGE OF DURIS
We conclude, among other things, that the trial court erred by: 1) awarding sanctions without first giving advance notice to Duris that sanctions were an issue at a child support modification hearing, and 2) not affording Duris a hearing to present
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:01A
ALSHAFIE v. LALLANDE
The new malpractice lawsuit was filed on August 14, 2001 against Dr. Wright and the prenatal care physicians. Subsequently, Agnew consulted with Dr. Michael Friedman, a board certified obstetrician and gynecologist, who advised Agnew he believed the
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:01A
ALSHAFIE v. LALLANDE
The new malpractice lawsuit was filed on August 14, 2001 against Dr. Wright and the prenatal care physicians. Subsequently, Agnew consulted with Dr. Michael Friedman, a board certified obstetrician and gynecologist, who advised Agnew he believed the
Updated: 03/15/2011 08:01A
Primary Categories