Latest Law News
SANCHEZ v. STATE
After a hearing on the motion, the trial court entered an order setting bail at $500000. Sanchez filed a notice of appeal, in which he alleged the bail is excessive and in violation of his constitutional rights. The jurisdiction of this court is
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:26A
SANCHEZ v. STATE
After a hearing on the motion, the trial court entered an order setting bail at $500000. Sanchez filed a notice of appeal, in which he alleged the bail is excessive and in violation of his constitutional rights. The jurisdiction of this court is
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:26A
MASTERSON v. DIOCESE OF NORTHWEST TEXAS
Before Chief Justice JONES, Justices HENSON and GOODWIN. This appeal arises from a property dispute among parishioners from the Episcopal Church of the Good Shepherd ("Good Shepherd") in San Angelo, Texas. In 2006, a majority of the Good Shepherd
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:26A
MASTERSON v. DIOCESE OF NORTHWEST TEXAS
Before Chief Justice JONES, Justices HENSON and GOODWIN. This appeal arises from a property dispute among parishioners from the Episcopal Church of the Good Shepherd ("Good Shepherd") in San Angelo, Texas. In 2006, a majority of the Good Shepherd
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:26A
SELVA v. PINNACLE PARTNERS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Marcus Selva appeals the trial court's order granting a temporary injunction in favor of Pinnacle Partners Financial Corporation. The only issues properly briefed for this court's consideration are: (1) whether the temporary injunction order is void
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:26A
CRISP v. STATE
On appeal, we are asked to decide whether: (1) there is sufficient evidence to support Crisp's conviction for felony murder; (2) the trial court erred in charging the jury on a theory of guilt that allegedly is not supported by the evidence;
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:26A
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO v. VASQUEZ
This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court's denial of the City of San Antonio's plea to the jurisdiction. We reverse the trial court's order and render a dismissal of appellees' claims against the City. Arnold Vasquez, Mark Unger,
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:26A
VAUGHNS v. STATE
After the trial court found two enhancement paragraphs true, the trial court sentenced Vaughns to thirty-five years' imprisonment. In three issues, Vaughns contends: (1) the trial court erred by refusing to submit a self-defense instruction,
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:26A
BROWN v. STATE
Prior to trial, Brown moved to suppress evidence arising from the trooper's stop of his vehicle. The trial court denied the suppression motion. Pursuant to a plea bargain, Brown then pleaded guilty to the charged offense and was sentenced to thirty
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:26A
HUCKABAY v. STATE
"By singling out that evidence, the trial court violate[s] Articles 36.14, 38.04, and 38.05 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and commit[s] a jury-charge error." Bartlett, 270 SW3d at 154.; see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. § 36.14 (West 2007) (specifying
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:26A
Primary Categories