Latest Law News
BETA REALTY UNIT 6 LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH
The trial court heard argument on March 5, 2010. The court requested further development of the factual record so that it might evaluate whether the tennis facility is exempt under the Fee Act. The parties submitted supplemental certifications
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:19A
STATE v. MOORE
There is, however, a clerical error in the judgment of conviction that requires a remand to correct the mistake and bring the judgment into conformity with the verdict and the record of the sentencing proceeding. The judgment of conviction reflects two
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:19A
STATE v. SANTIAGO
The trial court merged his conviction on count four into count five and his conviction on count two into counts three and six. We affirmed the convictions. State v. Santiago, No. A-4881-99 (App. Div. July 9, 2001), certif. denied, 170 NJ 210 (2001).
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:19A
KLAMA v. ZUNIGA-ELIZANDO
Klama was the named insured under a motorcycle insurance policy issued by Foremost, which contained policy limits for uninsured motorist (UM), bodily injury coverage, in the amount of $15000 per person and $30000 per accident.
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:19A
STATE v. CALDWELL
However, "[a] trial court's interpretation of the law and the legal consequences that flow from established facts are not entitled to any special deference." Manalapan Realty, LP v. Twp. Comm. of Manalapan, 140 NJ 366, 378 (1995).
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:19A
SEIDMAN v. CLIFTON SAVINGS BANK
JUSTICE RIVERA-SOTO, delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal requires that we revisit a long-standing rule concerning corporate governance matters and how, in its application, corporate actions are to be gauged. That rule is set forth plainly
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:19A
IN THE MATTER OF KUROWSKI
Michael Donnelly, of Purcellville, Virginia, on the brief, for the Home School Legal Defense Association, Christian Home Educators of New Hampshire, and Catholics United for Home Education, as amici curiae. Welts, White & Fontaine, PC, of Nashua (Lisa
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:19A
STATE v. REID
He argues that the Trial Court (Brown, J.) erred when it allowed the State to admit a videotape of the victim's interview with police and when it denied his motion for a mistrial. We affirm. The record reflects the following facts.
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:19A
WALTERS v. FLATHEAD CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC.
That provision states: [A]n employer is not subject to any liability whatever for the death of or personal injury to an employee covered by the Workers' Compensation Act or for any claims for contribution or indemnity asserted by a third person from
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:19A
STATE v. CAMP
He now appeals, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to convict and that the trial court erred in allowing the use of other crimes evidence during voir dire and at trial. He additionally alleges ineffective assistance of his trial counsel.
Updated: 03/17/2011 08:18A
Primary Categories