Latest Legal Advertising News
WHEATON v. LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD
The Subcommittee found that these liabilities were discharged by the bankruptcy court and Petitioner made no attempt at restitution. The Subcommittee further considered the fact that Petitioner failed to comply with Rule 3.28 of the Rules of Lawyer
Updated: 11/18/2011 07:30A
HARNDEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
If it did, then the taxes were assessed more than 240 days before the petition date and are dischargeable. If the assessment only occurred later, when the IRS account transcript shows the assessment was entered, the taxes are not dischargeable.
Updated: 11/18/2011 07:29A
IN RE HOLLINGTON
After reviewing the record, the parties' briefs, and applicable law, this Panel determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion. The bankruptcy court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and its conclusions of law
Updated: 11/18/2011 07:29A
IN RE HORSFALL
Though not fully audible, nor recorded, he made constant sotto vocc comments (some vulgar) during the trial, which were heard by court staff and visitors to the courtroom. Attorney Moermond's conduct was rude, petulant, immature and disrespectful.
Updated: 11/18/2011 07:29A
IN RE SIEMERS
The following constitutes the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for purposes of Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7052. In brief, the Court concludes that Debtors' objection should be sustained in part and denied in part.
Updated: 11/18/2011 07:29A
IN RE LOFTE'S, LLC
Notice of the Confirmation Hearing was sufficient and complied with applicable requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules. 3. The Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. 4. The Plan complies with applicable
Updated: 11/18/2011 07:29A
IN THE MATTER OF CHURCHILL
Evidence and a brief were filed and, pursuant to the court's authority under Nebraska Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7056-1, the motion was taken under advisement without oral arguments. This adversary proceeding was filed to avoid a junior lien on the
Updated: 11/18/2011 07:29A
IN RE SROA
The dispute here is over 704 4 th Street, which the Sroas argue is also over-encumbered, leaving Marin Mortgage wholly unsecured pursuant to § 506(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. Marin Mortgage argues that while it is undersecured, it is not unsecured.
Updated: 11/18/2011 07:29A
LICHTENSTEIN v. DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
The sale of the property foreclosed upon was substantially delayed by Lichtenstein's filing of a petition for bankruptcy and various litigation seeking to collaterally attack the final judgment of foreclosure. Sometime after entry of the foreclosure
Updated: 11/18/2011 07:26A
YELVERTON v. YELVERTON FARMS, LTD.
WENDELL W. WEBSTER, in his capacity as Chapter 7 Trustee in Bankruptcy for Steven Thomas Yelverton, Plaintiff, Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this
Updated: 11/18/2011 07:24A
Primary Categories