Latest Legal Marketing News
SCHULTZ v. LESTER
Appellants Douglas and Oralia Schultz appeal from the jury's take nothing verdict in favor of appellees Melvin L. Lester, M&K Logistics, Inc., and Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc. In six issues, appellants allege the trial court erred by: (1) admitting
Updated: 08/01/2011 08:23A
LALLY v. MUKKADA
{¶1} Edward Lally appeals the trial court's judgment that denied his motion for a directed verdict and motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, and that entered judgment in favor of Thresiamma A. Mukkada, MD, and Independent
Updated: 08/01/2011 08:20A
RICE v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Rice appeals the trial court's directed verdict in favor of BNSF following the close of Rice's evidence. We reverse and remand. On May 12, 2009, Rice filed a petition for damages claiming he sustained permanent and cumulative injuries,
Updated: 08/01/2011 08:18A
BUSH v. REED
The plaintiffs filed a timely notice of appeal, but the trial court later dismissed the appeal because of the delay in filing the transcript of the proceedings. It is from the dismissal order that the plaintiffs now appeal. Because the trial court did
Updated: 08/01/2011 08:15A
Dead gamer's father shows level-headed class
Naturally there's no official verdict on what caused the condition, but with Staniforth's father David pointing out that Chris spent up to 12 hours at a time playing on his Xbox without a break, it seems reasonable to make assumptions.
Updated: 08/01/2011 08:14A
MORISCH v. U.S.
The jury returned a verdict in Kreisman's favor and the district court later issued written findings of fact and conclusions of law on Gerald's FTCA claim, resulting in a judgment in the government's favor. The court concluded that Gerald failed to
Updated: 08/01/2011 08:12A
JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. RAPID FUNDING, LLC
James River argues on appeal that the damages verdict was based on valuation testimony that the district court should have excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 701. James River seeks a new trial on damages or remittitur of the damages verdict.
Updated: 08/01/2011 08:11A
PEOPLE EX REL. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. BAKKER
On respondent's motion, the court granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the roadway easement property and reduced that award from $68200 to $200. The court held that, as a matter of law, the roadway easement property had nominal value.
Updated: 08/01/2011 08:11A
LUTZ v. SORTWELL
Thereafter, the trial court denied the parties' motions for attorney fees, finding there was no prevailing party. Lutz contends (1) the court erred by excluding the testimony of her valuation expert, Gene Konrad; (2) the attorney fee ruling is contrary
Updated: 08/01/2011 08:11A
PRITCHARD v. CORAM HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Coram also appeals an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and a postjudgment order awarding costs to Pritchard. Pritchard cross-appeals from the judgment. Pritchard seeks a "correction" and increase in the judgment
Updated: 08/01/2011 08:11A
Primary Categories