Latest Legal Marketing News
KELLY v. SHOAF
Nancy Burton Shoaf (defendant) appeals entry of judgment on a jury verdict in favor of Joseph C. Kelly, III (plaintiff). Specifically, defendant argues that: 1) The trial court erred in denying her motion for directed verdict and judgment
Updated: 11/02/2011 10:12A
STATE v. RIVERA
At approximately noon, two men robbed Scott and her manager, Lashonda Bond, while they replenished a cash cassette in one of the bank's ATMs. One man approached Scott from her front and grabbed the cassette from her hands. As Scott struggled over the
Updated: 11/02/2011 10:12A
STATE v. LOCKLEAR
William Robert Locklear ("Defendant") appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of second-degree murder. Defendant argues the trial court committed plain and reversible error in its failure to intervene ex mero motu to strike certain statements
Updated: 11/02/2011 10:12A
STATE v. GILLESPIE
Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss and that he was deprived of his right to a unanimous jury verdict. We disagree and affirm the trial court's decision. Defendant further argues he was deprived effective
Updated: 11/02/2011 10:12A
ANDERSON v. PARKER
James and Rose Mary Anderson appeal the judgment of the trial court granting the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, for a new trial of Patricia Jeanne Parker, Trustee of the Camden W. Riley, Jr. Trust, and Jeanne L.
Updated: 11/02/2011 10:11A
CLARK v. RUSH
When the case was tried by a Clayton County jury, the trial court charged the jury with the pattern instruction on comparative negligence, and the court directed the jury to return its verdict on a form that, consistent with the pattern instruction,
Updated: 11/02/2011 10:10A
RAINES v. MAUGHAN
1 The case was tried by a Fulton County jury, which returned a verdict for Maughan, and Raines now appeals. Raines contends that the trial court erred when it failed to excuse a prospective juror for cause, refused to admit certain evidence,
Updated: 11/02/2011 10:10A
BROWN v. CLARK
Randall Brown, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the jury verdict in his 42 USC § 1983 action alleging excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 USC § 1291. We affirm.
Updated: 11/02/2011 10:09A
PEOPLE v. LOPEZ
Brenda Jasmine Lopez (defendant) appeals from a judgment upon a jury verdict finding her guilty of failing to register within five days of leaving a registered address (Pen. Code, 1 § 290.013). She contends that the evidence is insufficient to support
Updated: 11/02/2011 10:07A
Have your say: Spot-fixing scandal
What is your reaction to the verdict in the spot-fixing scandal involving Pakistan cricketers Salman Butt, Mohammad Aamer and Mohammad Asif? Will a harsh punishment help clean up the game? Send us your comments along with your photographs at
Updated: 11/02/2011 10:03A
Primary Categories