Latest Trial Court News
Jury Shown Photos Of Joanna's Body At Trial
Tabak was seen to remove his glasses and appear to rub his eyes as police pictures of the body were shown to the jury at Bristol Crown Court. Three images were shown of the police process to remove her body, which was lying in a "foetal" position,
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:48A
STATE v. O'KEEFE
940.09, and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for new trial because: (1) his right to confrontation was denied; (2) other acts evidence was improperly admitted; and (3) his trial
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:45A
STATE v. PEREZ-VALDEZ
He also challenges the trial court's denial of his motions for a mistrial based on a statement made by a state witness relating to the credibility of the victims. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in making these decisions.
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:45A
STATE v. FRANKLIN
Thus, we conclude that Franklin is not entitled to resentencing by the trial court and we affirm the Court of Appeals. On October 24, 2007, Franklin was found guilty of a number of offenses, including third degree assault (count I) and possession of
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:45A
STATE v. RUSS
He appeals the convictions on grounds that (1) the trial court erroneously refused to instruct the jury on lesser degree offenses and (2) the court's imposition of the sentence mandated by the persistent offender act without a jury determination as to
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:45A
EARLE v. U.S.
The Court therefore concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. As to petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the petitioner simply made no
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:45A
ACCIARD v. WHITNEY
This cause comes before the Court on Defendant/Counter-Claimant National Credit Union Administration's ("NCUA") Motion to Strike Jury Trial Demand (Doc. 1006), filed on July 22, 2011. On August 22, 2011, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants 1 filed a Response
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:45A
REESE v. STATE
The trial court assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment, probated for five years, and a $1000 fine. Later, the trial court revoked appellant's community supervision and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment and a $1000 fine.
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:45A
RUIZ v. STATE
The jury assessed a sentence of sixty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. In one point of error, Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:45A
CARTER v. CLINE
The trial court held that Carter failed to timely challenge the alleged defects in the domestication proceedings and therefore waived any objections to enforcement of those judgments in Texas. In seven issues on appeal, Carter contends that there was
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:45A
Primary Categories