Latest Trial Court News
SCHMIDT v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF ELECTIONS-POLL WORKER DEPT.
The trial court granted appellee's motion and dismissed the case. {¶ 4} "1. The Defendant's Answer of my original Complaint and Judge Brian Corrigan's reason for dismissal seem to me as if they did not read my Complaint. {¶ 5} "2.
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
TIBBITTS v. TIBBITTS
{¶ 3} "I. The trial court erred as a matter of law by ordering separate payments to be made by each party when only one obligation actually exists. The trial court should have set-off appellant's monetary obligation against the appellee's obligation
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
STATE v. BOWLING
He argues that the trial court failed to properly merge his drug trafficking and drug possession convictions upon remand from this court. We find no merit to his arguments and affirm. {¶ 2} In March 2009, the trial court sentenced Bowling to two years
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
DRAKE v. BARCLAY'S BANK DELAWARE, INC.
Before: Boyle, PJ, Rocco, J., and Keough, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Shirley Drake, appeals from the judgment of the trial court submitting his case to arbitration and staying the proceedings. We find merit to his appeal and reverse and remand.
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
WILK v. WILK
Upon receiving service of the complaint for divorce on October 29, 2010, appellant failed to file a formal answer with the court. On December 29, 2010, the trial court held a hearing for a final determination of the issues. Appellant did not appear at
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
HARPER v. HARPER
The trial court noted that each party had reviewed the agreement independently, and with counsel, and that each party understood the terms contained within the agreement. The separation agreement explicitly stated that the parties' agreement as to
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
HIPPELY v. LINCOLN ELEC. HOLDINGS, INC.
The case proceeded to trial and the jury returned a verdict in favor of Lincoln Electric. Appellant did file a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, as well as a motion for a new trial, both of which the trial court denied.
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
CITY OF CLEVELAND v. OLIVARES
The trial court held a hearing on the motion to dismiss. {¶ 4} On December 16, 2010, the trial court granted Olivares's motion to dismiss. In its journal entry issued the same day, the trial court marked the dismissal of the CCO 435.01 violation "nolle
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
BAWAB v. BAWAB
In his sole assignment of error, he claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to do so because it never obtained personal jurisdiction over him. We find no merit to his arguments and affirm. {¶ 2} The parties were divorced in April 2005 after 21
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
STATE v. CARROLL
He raises one assignment of error for our review: "The trial court erred when it denied [his] motion to suppress evidence." Finding no merit to his appeal, we affirm. {¶ 2} Carroll was indicted on three counts: drug trafficking, in violation of RC
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:44A
Primary Categories