Latest Trial Court News
IN THE INTEREST OF T.E.
After a bench trial, 1 Lamb's parental rights to TE 2 were terminated. We affirm the order of the trial court because (1) legally and factually sufficient evidence support termination under Section 161.001(1)(Q) of the Texas Family Code,
Updated: 11/24/2011 08:04A
STATE v. ELWELL
The State argues the trial court erred in holding the State failed to comply with subsection 56-5-2953(A)(2)(d) of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2007) by turning off a breath test video recorder after Elwell refused to take the test and before the
Updated: 11/24/2011 08:04A
NUTT CORPORATION v. HOWELL ROAD, LLC.
This appeal arises from a bench trial resulting in an order awarding an equitable lien to Respondent The Nutt Corporation d/b/a TNC Engineering (the Nutt Corporation). Appellant Howell Road, LLC (Howell Road) argues the trial court erred in allowing
Updated: 11/24/2011 08:04A
D.R.C. v. J.A.Z.
On July 6, 2005, the trial court denied Father's request for visitation, and he timely appealed. On April 25, 2006, the Superior Court vacated and remanded to the common pleas court finding that the trial court erred in failing to hold a hearing
Updated: 11/24/2011 08:04A
IN RE R.I.S.
He appeals the Superior Court's reversal of the York County trial court's orders denying petitions for the involuntary termination of his parental rights and for changes in the placement goals for the children from reunification to adoption.
Updated: 11/24/2011 08:04A
WHALEN v. COMMONWEALTH
The trial court admitted Appellee into an ARD program on January 16, 2009, after expressly making a determination that Appellee's 1998 Florida DUI conviction did not present a bar to his entry into this program. 1 Appellee successfully completed his
Updated: 11/24/2011 08:04A
FOCHT v. FOCHT
In this case, we interpret a provision of the Pennsylvania Divorce Code 1 to establish when a cause of action in negligence accrues for purposes of determining whether the settlement proceeds are marital property. Because the Superior Court erred in
Updated: 11/24/2011 08:04A
BARRICK v. HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL OF SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY
Dr. Green, who was Mr. Barrick's treating physician, was also designated to testify as an expert witness at trial. After careful review, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Updated: 11/24/2011 08:03A
PORTSIDE INVESTORS, L.P. v. NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
The jury found that Northern breached its contract of insurance with Portside and awarded plaintiff $1407859.00 as the Actual Cash Value of the Pier at the time of the collapse. 1 The court reduced the verdict to $1207859 to reflect a prior payment of
Updated: 11/24/2011 08:03A
STATE v. CAMPBELL
Reynolds, 239 Or.App. 313, 243 P.3d 496 (2010), the trial court erred, initially, in denying his motion to dismiss the charging instrument and, later, in convicting him of a misdemeanor. The state, for its part, concedes that contempt is not a crime
Updated: 11/24/2011 08:03A
Primary Categories