Latest Criminal Law News
BUCHANAN v. CLINE
Appellant is an inmate in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. He is currently serving a sixty-year sentence for his conviction occurring on November 1, 2000, for aggravated sexual assault of a child.
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:25A
BUCHANAN v. GANNAWAY
The trial court granted the bailiff's special exceptions to appellant's pleadings. The trial court subsequently dismissed appellant's pleadings after he failed to cure the deficiencies by repleading his allegations. We affirm. Appellant is an inmate in
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:25A
BUCHANAN v. HERRIDGE
Appellant is an inmate in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. He is currently serving a sixty-year sentence for his conviction occurring on November 1, 2000, for aggravated sexual assault of a child.
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
BUCHANAN v. ARMSTRONG
This appeal arises from Timothy W. Buchanan's pro se civil action filed against the district judge of Borden County. The trial court granted the district judge's motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
BUCHANAN v. COOLEY
This appeal arises from Timothy W. Buchanan's pro se civil action filed against the district attorney of Borden County. The trial court granted the district attorney's motion for summary judgment. We affirm. Appellant is an inmate in the Institutional
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
ALLEN v. STEPHENSON
Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston. Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown and Christopher. Appellant Charles Anthony Allen appeals the dismissal of his suit under Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex.
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
BUCHANAN v. MURPHY
The trial court granted the foreman's motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We affirm. Appellant is an inmate in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. He is currently serving a sixty-year sentence
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
PEOPLE v. ELLIOTT
Pursuantto Penal Law § 70.45 (1), when a court imposes a determinate sentence, it is required to also impose an additional period of postrelease supervision (see People v Sparber, 10 NY3d 457, 469-470 [2008]). If the sentencing court fails to do so
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
PEOPLE v. ELLIOTT
Pursuantto Penal Law § 70.45 (1), when a court imposes a determinate sentence, it is required to also impose an additional period of postrelease supervision (see People v Sparber, 10 NY3d 457, 469-470 [2008]). If the sentencing court fails to do so
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
Editorial: Review must find fix for justice system
But with the number of new criminal cases rising every year, some lawyers warn that the city could soon see major backlogs and more delays. We hope that the province will act before that happens. An adequately performing justice system is essential for
Updated: 03/09/2012 07:48A
Primary Categories