Latest Trial Court News
Brutal killer found guilty of double murder
An earlier crown court trial in March found Howson guilty of also murdering Neil Gilmour but the jury could not reach a verdict on whether he killed Mr Atkinson. The judge ordered a retrial for this offence and the jury concluded that Howson did in
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
CHAVEZ v. KELLEY TRUCKING, INC.
Plaintiff Pinnacol Assurance (Pinnacol) appeals the trial court's order denying its motions for forfeiture or apportionment of proceeds from the settlement of noneconomic damages claims between plaintiff Jose Chavez (Chavez) and defendant Kelley
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
PEOPLE v. HOLT
The People appeal the trial court's order vacating a jury's guilty verdict and ordering a new trial. We reverse and remand. In doing so, we conclude that a juror's statement during deliberations regarding the severity of a charged offense does not
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
WESTPAC ASPEN INVESTMENTS, LLC v. RESIDENCES AT LITTLE NELL DEVELOPMENT, LLC
In this real property action, defendants Preston B. and Betty D. Henn (the Henns) appeal a trial court order granting a preliminary injunction against them and in favor of plaintiff, Westpac Aspen Investments, LLC (Westpac). We affirm.
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
PEOPLE v. HARMON
We conclude that the trial court erred in failing to take corrective action after a juror submitted a note suggesting that he or she had determined Harmon's guilt based on a misperception that Harmon had conceded guilt in opening statement.
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
PEOPLE v. GRASSI
A division of this court in People v. Grassi, 192 P.3d 496, 498 (Colo. App. 2008) (Grassi I), remanded this case to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the People had probable cause to draw defendant's blood.
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
PEOPLE v. SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Safety National has timely appealed from the summary judgment declaring its bail bond forfeit, but its appeal does not challenge the trial court's decision on its motion to vacate forfeiture. Rather, Safety National now asserts that because the trial
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
OCHOA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY
Although pretrial writ relief is sparingly granted, where the trial court's ruling may properly be evaluated as to its correctness or erroneousness as a matter of law, and where leaving it in place may substantially prejudice the petitioner's case,
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
PEOPLE v. PENA
On that date, section 1465.8 required a $20 fee be imposed for court security. After a successful appeal, Pena was re-sentenced on November 12, 2010. On that date, section 1465.8 required a $30 fee be imposed for court security. The trial court imposed
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
SPIELBERG v. CARLSEN
1 After the trial court struck defendant's cross-complaint, which defendant filed after plaintiffs' had submitted their documents to obtain defendant's default, defendant also purported to appeal that order. We consolidated the appeals for resolution
Updated: 10/14/2011 06:42A
Primary Categories