Latest Trial Court News
JACKSON v. JACKSON
For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court. {¶ 2} Mrs. Jackson and her ex-husband, Brian R. Jackson, were married in 1996. They have one child, born in 1998. Mr. Jackson filed a complaint for divorce in 2007, and the trial for the divorce was
Updated: 02/22/2012 07:13A
STATE v. SMITH
However, for the following reasons, we find that reasonable cause did exist for the traffic stop, and, therefore, the trial court did not err in overruling her motion to suppress {¶ 3} Just before one am on March 1, 2011, Trooper Ganley of the Ohio
Updated: 02/22/2012 07:13A
TABOR v. GOODRICH
Mike DeWine, Ohio Attorney General, State Office Tower, 30 East Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43215; and Maura O'Neill Jaite, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Justice Section, 150 East Gay Street, 16th Floor, Columbus, OH 43215 (For Respondent)
Updated: 02/22/2012 07:13A
STATE v. BROOKS
{¶ 1} This is an accelerated-calendar appeal, from a final judgment of the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas. Appellant, the state of Ohio, brought this appeal pursuant to Crim.R. 12(K), seeking reversal of the trial court's determination to
Updated: 02/22/2012 07:13A
STATE v. CHAPMAN
{¶ 1} After he was twice tried and convicted on various charges, including murder and attempted murder, this Court vacated Justin Chapman's sentence of 30 years to life. On remand, Mr. Chapman successfully moved for recusal of the trial judge.
Updated: 02/22/2012 07:13A
STATE v. MOSES
Because there is sufficient evidence to support defendant's initial arrest for resisting public officer, we affirm the trial court's denial of defendant's pre-trial motion to suppress cocaine found on defendant's person subsequent to his arrest.
Updated: 02/22/2012 07:13A
STATE v. MOSES
Because there is sufficient evidence to support defendant's initial arrest for resisting public officer, we affirm the trial court's denial of defendant's pre-trial motion to suppress cocaine found on defendant's person subsequent to his arrest.
Updated: 02/22/2012 07:13A
STATE v. PAGAN
14-208.9(a), the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss. Where the State provided defendant with a copy of the arrest worksheet containing the address given by defendant to the arresting officer in accordance with NC Gen.
Updated: 02/22/2012 07:13A
STATE v. PAGAN
14-208.9(a), the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss. Where the State provided defendant with a copy of the arrest worksheet containing the address given by defendant to the arresting officer in accordance with NC Gen.
Updated: 02/22/2012 07:13A
STATE v. WRIGHT
Because the trial court made a finding of fact that a longer period of probation than was specified in NC Gen. Stat. § 15A-1343.2(d) was necessary, we find no error in the trial court's imposition of a 48 month probationary period. On 7 December 2009,
Updated: 02/22/2012 07:13A
Primary Categories