Latest Trial Court News
CalTEL, INC. v. PATEL
Anjay Patel appeals the trial court's order awarding CalTel, Inc. (CalTel) $80000 in damages, arguing the trial court erred in: (1) not dismissing the cause of action against him when CalTel had no standing to bring suit, (2) allowing speculative
Updated: 02/23/2012 07:19A
STATE v. NITZSCHE
The trial court sentenced him to 12 years in prison. Mr. Nitzsche has appealed, assigning as error that the trial court incorrectly failed to declare a mistrial, that his convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence, and that his convictions
Updated: 02/23/2012 07:19A
STATE v. NITZSCHE
The trial court sentenced him to 12 years in prison. Mr. Nitzsche has appealed, assigning as error that the trial court incorrectly failed to declare a mistrial, that his convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence, and that his convictions
Updated: 02/23/2012 07:19A
BOOMERANG TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT CO.
Boomerang Transportation, Inc. ("Boomerang"), appeals the trial court's adverse summary judgment on its contract claim against Miracle Recreation Equipment Company ("Miracle"). Boomerang contends that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to the
Updated: 02/23/2012 07:18A
BOOMERANG TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT CO.
Boomerang Transportation, Inc. ("Boomerang"), appeals the trial court's adverse summary judgment on its contract claim against Miracle Recreation Equipment Company ("Miracle"). Boomerang contends that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to the
Updated: 02/23/2012 07:18A
WHERLAND v. FASTABEND
In this medical malpractice case, the plaintiffs, Patricia Ann Wherland and Fred Wherland, appeal the trial court's order granting an exception of prescription to the defendant, Dr. Carl A. Fastabend, and dismissing their claims against the doctor.
Updated: 02/23/2012 07:17A
WHERLAND v. FASTABEND
In this medical malpractice case, the plaintiffs, Patricia Ann Wherland and Fred Wherland, appeal the trial court's order granting an exception of prescription to the defendant, Dr. Carl A. Fastabend, and dismissing their claims against the doctor.
Updated: 02/23/2012 07:17A
INGRAM v. STATE
Specifically, he argues that the trial court erred when it admitted into evidence his recorded statement obtained by police without properly being advised of his Miranda 2 rights. He also argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his
Updated: 02/23/2012 07:17A
INGRAM v. STATE
Specifically, he argues that the trial court erred when it admitted into evidence his recorded statement obtained by police without properly being advised of his Miranda 2 rights. He also argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his
Updated: 02/23/2012 07:17A
BISHOP v. STATE
Specifically, Bishop contends that the trial court erred when it admitted hearsay evidence in a police officer's probable cause affidavit at the hearing, and without the probable cause affidavit, he argues the evidence is insufficient to support the
Updated: 02/23/2012 07:17A
Primary Categories