Latest Trial Court News
EX PARTE O'NEAL
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/01/2012 07:16A
EX PARTE CAPPS
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/01/2012 07:16A
EX PARTE RUBIO
This case is before us because no application for writ of habeas corpus has been timely filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071. 1 On August 10, 2010, the trial court appointed David A. Schulman to represent
Updated: 03/01/2012 07:16A
EX PARTE THOMPSON
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/01/2012 07:16A
EX PARTE McCRAY
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/01/2012 07:16A
EX PARTE THURMOND
The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set applicant's punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal.
Updated: 03/01/2012 07:16A
EX PARTE PADILLA
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 SW2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967).
Updated: 03/01/2012 07:16A
SPIVEY v. STATE
After finding appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at five years' imprisonment and a $1000 fine. In a single issue, appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion by sentencing him to imprisonment. We modify the trial court's
Updated: 03/01/2012 07:16A
CHUKWUJEKU v. STATE
The trial court assessed punishment at ten years in prison, probated for three years, in each burglary conviction, and two years in the state jail, probated for three years, in the organized criminal activity conviction. The trial court later revoked
Updated: 03/01/2012 07:16A
CARRASCO v. STATE
After finding appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at twenty years' imprisonment. In a single issue, appellant contends the trial court erred when it issued a judgment identifying the wrong statute for the offense. We modify the trial
Updated: 03/01/2012 07:16A
Primary Categories