Latest Trial Court News
PEOPLE v. LeGRAND
The verdict convicting defendant of second-degree murder at his third trial was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The issue to be determined is whether the trial court committed reversible
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
CAMERON v. EWING
The trial court determined the payments were beyond the reach of the judgment creditors, and denied their motion to compel the mortgagee to comply with a writ of execution. We reverse, reasoning the mortgagee's obligation to make monthly payments to
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
HOOKER v. GREER
We affirm the trial court's finding that the lis pendens was improperly filed. However, because the trial court based the attorney's fees award on an improper interpretation of the Litigation Accountability Act, we reverse the judgment,
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
BENOIT v. BENOIT
This appeal arises from a trial court judgment partitioning the community of acquets and gains formerly existing between Troy Benoit and Tammy Williams Benoit. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the judgment of the trial court.
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
IN THE MATTER OF TERMINATION OF PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP OF K.E.
TE ("Mother") and JE ("Father") appeal the involuntary termination of their respective parental rights to their child, KE, contending, inter alia, that the trial court's judgment terminating their respective parental rights must be reversed because the
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA v. MERCHANDISING
In 2011, the trial court granted the defendants' Trial Rule 41(E) motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute after the case had been pending for eighteen years, the court failed to rule on the summary judgment motions for fourteen years,
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA v. MERCHANDISING
In 2011, the trial court granted the defendants' Trial Rule 41(E) motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute after the case had been pending for eighteen years, the court failed to rule on the summary judgment motions for fourteen years,
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
AIKEN DERMATOLOGY & SKIN CANCER CLINIC, P.A. v. DAVLONG SYSTEMS, INC.
Aiken Dermatology filed a substantially identical complaint (Case Two) against DavLong on March 25, 2003. On February 4, 2005, the trial court denied DavLong's motion for summary judgment on the breach of warranty claim, but granted DavLong summary
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
GILES v. HEYWARD
The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of Heyward, awarding him $125000 in damages. The trial court entered judgment in that amount, and Giles appeals. Giles argues that the doctrine of the separation of church and state
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
OLD PEACHTREE PARTNERS, LLC v. GWINNETT COUNTY
In these consolidated appeals, we granted interlocutory review of a trial court order denying cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Gwinnett County, Georgia ("the County"), and Old Peachtree Partners, LLC and Gwinnett Community Bank (collectively
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:23A
Primary Categories