Latest Trial Court News
HARRY KAUFMANN MOTORCARS, INC. v. SCHUMAKER PERFORMANCE, INC.
Appellant-Plaintiff Harry Kaufmann Motorcars, Inc. ("HKM") appeals the trial court's decision to set aside a foreign judgment rendered in the State of Wisconsin against Appellee-Defendant Schumaker Performance, Inc. ("Schumaker") as void for lack of
Updated: 03/19/2012 08:30A
TIEGREEN v. STATE
The jury returned a verdict finding that Tiegreen was competent to stand trial, and judgment was entered thereon. Tiegreen appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and that the trial court erred in charging the jury
Updated: 03/19/2012 08:30A
TIEGREEN v. STATE
The jury returned a verdict finding that Tiegreen was competent to stand trial, and judgment was entered thereon. Tiegreen appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and that the trial court erred in charging the jury
Updated: 03/19/2012 08:30A
CARYI v. CARYI
The trial court assessed attorney's fees of $16965, and costs of $1295, against the former wife, finding that the former wife's actions during the post-dissolution litigation were "vexatious, unnecessary and infectious (sic)." We reverse.
Updated: 03/19/2012 08:29A
CARYI v. CARYI
The trial court assessed attorney's fees of $16965, and costs of $1295, against the former wife, finding that the former wife's actions during the post-dissolution litigation were "vexatious, unnecessary and infectious (sic)." We reverse.
Updated: 03/19/2012 08:29A
Airan2, AIRAN-PACE & CROSA, P.A. v. CADENCE BANK
The trial court entered the order based on the filing of a third-party complaint that the trial court concluded was frivolous. We affirm the order in all respects except for the judgment against Mr. Airan. The law firm was counsel of record for four
Updated: 03/19/2012 08:29A
Airan2, AIRAN-PACE & CROSA, P.A. v. CADENCE BANK
The trial court entered the order based on the filing of a third-party complaint that the trial court concluded was frivolous. We affirm the order in all respects except for the judgment against Mr. Airan. The law firm was counsel of record for four
Updated: 03/19/2012 08:29A
WILLIAMS v. RYAN
Charles Andrew Williams ("Williams") appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Williams alleges on appeal that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing, that his trial and appellate counsel provided ineffective
Updated: 03/19/2012 08:29A
OSIKA v. PATRICK
Bernadette Maria Osika appeals the district court's denial of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm. In 2004, Osika assisted her boyfriend, a gang member, in robbing a victim and stealing his vehicle. See People v. Villalobos, 51 Cal.
Updated: 03/19/2012 08:29A
U.S. v. PARKER
The federal trial court denied the motion to suppress. We will affirm. Around 4 am on October 22, 2009, after receiving an anonymous 911 call, 1 Philadelphia police dispatch issued two radio calls one minute apart reporting a robbery in progress and a
Updated: 03/19/2012 08:29A
Primary Categories