Latest Trial Court News
PILIERO v. PILIERO
Id. The trial court found that the parties had intended to equalize their incomes "on an ongoing basis" and reduced the spousal support obligation by approximately $600 per month. The trial court did not, however, make a finding with respect to whether
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
STRAQUADINE v. CROWNE POINTE CARE CTR.
On June 3, 2010, the trial court granted appellee's motion to dismiss, concluding that appellants had raised medical claims and were required to provide an affidavit of merit. The trial court entered a final judgment dismissing appellants' complaint
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
STRAQUADINE v. CROWNE POINTE CARE CTR.
On June 3, 2010, the trial court granted appellee's motion to dismiss, concluding that appellants had raised medical claims and were required to provide an affidavit of merit. The trial court entered a final judgment dismissing appellants' complaint
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
STATE v. FISHER
Where there was substantial evidence that defendant was the perpetrator of a robbery and where defense counsel did not render ineffective assistance of counsel, there was no error in the judgment of the trial court. Defendant was indicted on 8 March
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
STATE v. FISHER
Where there was substantial evidence that defendant was the perpetrator of a robbery and where defense counsel did not render ineffective assistance of counsel, there was no error in the judgment of the trial court. Defendant was indicted on 8 March
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
STATE v. UNDERWOOD
We must decide whether the trial court erred by (I) denying Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictments; (II) failing to submit the lesser included offenses of misdemeanor death by vehicle and misdemeanor hit and run to the jury; and (III) allowing
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
WINSLOW v. FORTNEY
Robert Fortney ("Defendant") appeals the trial court's 18 March 2011 order granting Felicia Winslow's ("Plaintiff") motion to renew a no-contact order entered against Defendant 12 March 2010. For the following reasons, we affirm. On 12 March 2010,
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
WINSLOW v. FORTNEY
Robert Fortney ("Defendant") appeals the trial court's 18 March 2011 order granting Felicia Winslow's ("Plaintiff") motion to renew a no-contact order entered against Defendant 12 March 2010. For the following reasons, we affirm. On 12 March 2010,
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
STATE v. PENNINGTON
On appeal, we must determine whether the trial court erred in denying Defendant's motion to dismiss the charge of felonious breaking and entering, and whether the trial court erred in denying Defendant's Rule 403 motion to exclude the evidence
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
EDWARDS v. PITT COUNTY HEALTH DIRECTOR
Thereafter, Petitioners petitioned Pitt County District Court for judicial review of the decision of the Board of Health, contending, inter alia, that the Board of Health's enforcement of the North Carolina smoking ban — specifically enforcement of
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
Primary Categories