Latest Trial Court News
JOHNS v. STATE
After the jury found him guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at 120 days in jail, probated for 18 months, and a $600 fine. In three issues, appellant raises two issues involving the admission of evidence and contends the prosecutor committed
Updated: 03/28/2012 08:59A
MERRITT v. STATE
A jury convicted Lowell Bruce Merritt of retaliation, and the trial court assessed punishment at two years probated for five years and a $3000 fine. In four issues, appellant complains about the legal sufficiency of the evidence to support his
Updated: 03/28/2012 08:59A
IN THE INTEREST OF D.M.D.
In four issues, appellant contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court's termination of appellant's parent-child relationship with her four children, DMD, TSD, TMD, and DMD a/k/a DD We affirm.
Updated: 03/28/2012 08:59A
WIESE v. HEATHLAKE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
The trial court granted injunctive relief and statutory attorney's fees. In 16 issues, the homeowner challenges the trial court's interpretation of the restrictive covenant, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court's findings of fact,
Updated: 03/28/2012 08:59A
DUKE v. STATE
From a guilty verdict and a sentence of sixty years' imprisonment, and after a post-judgment recantation by SS and a denial of Duke's motion for new trial, Duke appeals on various grounds. We affirm the judgment of the trial court because (1) no error
Updated: 03/28/2012 08:59A
JONES v. STATE
ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JERRY L. SMITH and JEFFREY S. BIVINS, JJ., joined. The Petitioner, Tommy Earl Jones, appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief based upon
Updated: 03/28/2012 08:59A
STATE v. SMITH
This case came before the Supreme Court on February 9, 2012, on appeal from a judgment of conviction after a jury verdict finding the defendant, Christopher Smith (defendant or Smith), guilty of numerous acts of child molestation. On April 6, 2010,
Updated: 03/28/2012 08:59A
C.M.K. v. K.E.M.
The trial court set forth the factual background and procedural history of this case as follows. [Mother] . . . was born on August 12, 1970 and resides . . . in Grove City, Mercer County, Pennsylvania where she has lived since May of 2010.
Updated: 03/28/2012 08:59A
ARLISS MTGE. CO., LLC v. WOODFORD
{¶ 1} Carl H. Woodford is appealing from the trial court's overruling of his motion for relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B). He assigns a single error for our consideration: The Trial Court erred in denying Carl H. Woodford's Motion for Relief from
Updated: 03/28/2012 08:58A
ARLISS MTGE. CO., LLC v. WOODFORD
{¶ 1} Carl H. Woodford is appealing from the trial court's overruling of his motion for relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B). He assigns a single error for our consideration: The Trial Court erred in denying Carl H. Woodford's Motion for Relief from
Updated: 03/28/2012 08:58A
Primary Categories