Latest Trial Court News
STATE v. SMITH
After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced the defendant to thirteen years and six months to be served in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court erred when it: (1) relied upon hearsay
Updated: 04/02/2012 11:27A
COMMONWEALTH v. $8337.00 U.S. CURRENCY
Keith Holmes (Holmes) appeals pro se from the September 7, 2011 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County (trial court) directing that $1664.00 in United States (US) currency be forfeited to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth)
Updated: 04/02/2012 11:27A
COMMONWEALTH v. $8337.00 U.S. CURRENCY
Keith Holmes (Holmes) appeals pro se from the September 7, 2011 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County (trial court) directing that $1664.00 in United States (US) currency be forfeited to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth)
Updated: 04/02/2012 11:27A
STATE v. DAVIS
The trial court sentenced him to eighteen years to life in prison. He has appealed. This Court affirms his convictions because he was not entitled to a voluntary manslaughter jury instruction in relation to the felony murder via felonious assault
Updated: 04/02/2012 11:27A
STATE v. DAVIS
The trial court sentenced him to eighteen years to life in prison. He has appealed. This Court affirms his convictions because he was not entitled to a voluntary manslaughter jury instruction in relation to the felony murder via felonious assault
Updated: 04/02/2012 11:27A
STATE v. GUADE
to pay restitution for expenses related to the conviction, (2) reverse the part of the judgment ordering restitution for expenses not related to the conviction, and (3) remand the matter to the trial court for it to revise the restitution order.
Updated: 04/02/2012 11:27A
STATE v. GUADE
to pay restitution for expenses related to the conviction, (2) reverse the part of the judgment ordering restitution for expenses not related to the conviction, and (3) remand the matter to the trial court for it to revise the restitution order.
Updated: 04/02/2012 11:27A
IN RE L.J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, LJ ("appellant"), appeals from the May 17, 2011 judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, Juvenile Branch, wherein the trial court adopted the magistrate's decision adjudicating
Updated: 04/02/2012 11:27A
IN RE L.J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, LJ ("appellant"), appeals from the May 17, 2011 judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, Juvenile Branch, wherein the trial court adopted the magistrate's decision adjudicating
Updated: 04/02/2012 11:27A
STATE v. THOMPSON
{¶ 3} Appellant's counsel states in his motion that he thoroughly reviewed the record in this case and concluded that the trial court did not commit any error prejudicial to appellant. However, in compliance with the requirements of Anders, supra,
Updated: 04/02/2012 11:27A
Primary Categories