Latest Trial Court News
IN RE COMMITMENT OF COX.
The trial court entered a final judgment and an order of civil commitment under the Act. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. In issue one, Cox argues that the State committed fundamental reversible error in submitting requests for admissions and
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
ALLEN v. STEPHENSON
Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston. Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown and Christopher. Appellant Charles Anthony Allen appeals the dismissal of his suit under Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex.
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
ALLEN v. STEPHENSON
Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston. Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown and Christopher. Appellant Charles Anthony Allen appeals the dismissal of his suit under Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex.
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
BUCHANAN v. MURPHY
The trial court granted the foreman's motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We affirm. Appellant is an inmate in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. He is currently serving a sixty-year sentence
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
UNKART v. STATE
The court ordered that the sentences were to run concurrently. Appellant presents two issues on appeal: (1) during voir dire, the trial court improperly commented on appellant's right to remain silent and thereby vitiated appellant's presumption of
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
UNKART v. STATE
The court ordered that the sentences were to run concurrently. Appellant presents two issues on appeal: (1) during voir dire, the trial court improperly commented on appellant's right to remain silent and thereby vitiated appellant's presumption of
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
STATE v. BURNS MOTORS, INC.
By a single issue, the State contends that the trial court erred in submitting a definition of "price bumping"—a "non-laundry list" violation of the DTPA—that improperly required intentional conduct. We conclude that the error, if any, committed by the
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
BYROM v. RANDSTAD NORTH AMERICA
The trial court found that the employee did not sustain his burden of proof as to causation. Employee has appealed, arguing that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's finding. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
JEFF v. BUCKINGHAM TOWNSHIP
Jeff and Mary Bretz (Neighboring Property Owners) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County (trial court) affirming the Buckingham Township (Township) Board of Supervisors' (Boards) decision approving the Central Bucks School
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
Jury in singer trial is sent home early
The jury in the trial of Sixties pop star PJ Proby, accused of £47000 benefit fraud, was sent home early from Worcester Crown Court yesterday. Defence barrister David Gottlieb asked for documents from the Department of Work and Pensions to be produced
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
Primary Categories