Latest Trial Court News
JEFF v. BUCKINGHAM TOWNSHIP
Jeff and Mary Bretz (Neighboring Property Owners) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County (trial court) affirming the Buckingham Township (Township) Board of Supervisors' (Boards) decision approving the Central Bucks School
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
EADY v. COMMODORE EXPRESS, INC.
The trial court held that the injury was the result of the employee's attempted assault on a co-employee and, therefore, did not arise from his employment. The complaint was dismissed, and the employee has appealed, arguing that the trial court's
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
IN RE PETITION FOR INITIATIVE TO PREVENT SALE
The Gracedale Initiative Petition Committee (Committee) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County (trial court) denying reconsideration of the Committee's motion for attorney fees and costs. Because a trial court order
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
WICKLINE v. HOYER
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants appeal the decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, General Division. The common pleas court granted defendant- appellee's motion for summary judgment. The trial court committed prejudicial error in granting
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
PHH MTGE. CORP. v. SANTIAGO
Appellee moved for default judgment based on appellant's failure to file an answer or otherwise defend the action, and on July 22, 2010, the trial court granted judgment in favor of appellee. The court ordered the sale of the property at a sheriff's
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
CITY OF PARMA v. PARMA FIRE FIGHTERS ASSN. LOCAL 639
BEFORE: Jones, J., Boyle, PJ, and Celebrezze, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the city of Parma, appeals from the trial court's judgment confirming and enforcing the arbitration award. We affirm. {¶ 2} Parma and defendant-appellee, Parma Fire Fighters
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
STATE v. SMITH
He complains that the trial court ordered the same sentence that it had previously given him, did not weigh seriousness and recidivism factors when considering the felony sentencing guidelines, and did not state that it considered the requisite
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
STATE v. CLARKE
BEFORE: Jones, J., Stewart, PJ, and Rocco, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Roland Clarke, appeals the trial court's June 9, 2011 judgment denying his motion to terminate postrelease supervision. We reverse. {¶ 2} In 2003, Clarke was charged with several
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
STATE v. TORRES
The state complains that because Torres's reclassification as a tier III sexual offender was lawful and subjected him to registration requirements under the Adam Walsh Act ("AWA"), the trial court erred in allowing him to withdraw his guilty plea for
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
STATE v. JAY
{¶ 3} Appellant sought review by the Ohio Supreme Court. The court accepted appeal on Propositions of Law No. I ("the trial court erred when it failed to grant appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal as to the offenses of gross sexual imposition
Updated: 03/09/2012 08:24A
Primary Categories