Latest Trial Court News
BERG v. TORRINGTON LIVESTOCK CATTLE COMPANY
The district court erred in denying Bergs their preserved right to a jury trial. 2. The district court erred in holding that there was no breech [sic] of contract against Torrington Livestock Cattle Company. 3. The district court erred in holding
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:21A
PARSONS v. PARSONS
Ricky I. Parsons (husband) appeals the trial court's equitable distribution award. Husband argues that the trial court abused its discretion by (1) failing to abide by the expressed intent and terms of the parties' pre-marital agreement; (2) violating
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:21A
PARSONS v. PARSONS
Ricky I. Parsons (husband) appeals the trial court's equitable distribution award. Husband argues that the trial court abused its discretion by (1) failing to abide by the expressed intent and terms of the parties' pre-marital agreement; (2) violating
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:21A
CITY OF DALLAS v. HERZ
The City of Dallas brings this interlocutory appeal of the trial court's order denying the City's plea to the jurisdiction to Jill Herz, PC's claim for attorney's fees under section 417.003 of the Texas Labor Code. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:20A
CITY OF DALLAS v. HERZ
The City of Dallas brings this interlocutory appeal of the trial court's order denying the City's plea to the jurisdiction to Jill Herz, PC's claim for attorney's fees under section 417.003 of the Texas Labor Code. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:20A
COLE v. MARVIN WINDOWS OF TENNESSEE
The trial court based its award of disability benefits on the MIR physician's rating. The employee has appealed, contending that she successfully rebutted the statutory presumption of correctness given to the MIR physician's rating. We affirm the trial
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:20A
COLE v. MARVIN WINDOWS OF TENNESSEE
The trial court based its award of disability benefits on the MIR physician's rating. The employee has appealed, contending that she successfully rebutted the statutory presumption of correctness given to the MIR physician's rating. We affirm the trial
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:20A
STATE v. GILBERT
The state has conceded that the trial court should have merged the gun specification sentences, and we correct this error herein. Appellant also argues that there were allied offenses that should have merged at sentencing. The analysis for appellate
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:20A
STATE v. GILBERT
The state has conceded that the trial court should have merged the gun specification sentences, and we correct this error herein. Appellant also argues that there were allied offenses that should have merged at sentencing. The analysis for appellate
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:20A
PILIERO v. PILIERO
Id. The trial court found that the parties had intended to equalize their incomes "on an ongoing basis" and reduced the spousal support obligation by approximately $600 per month. The trial court did not, however, make a finding with respect to whether
Updated: 03/21/2012 09:19A
Primary Categories